Email this article 
THE USE OF NEURAL NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES BY TEACHERS OF OLDER AGE GROUPS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF REPRESENTATIVES OF MEDICAL AND SOCIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
- Authors: Malinovich E.V.1, Nadutkina I.E.2,3, Konev I.V.3, Danakin N.S.3
- Affiliations:
- N. A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health, 105064, Moscow, Russia
- Saint Petersburg State Agrarian University, 196601, Saint Petersburg, Russia
- Belgorod State National Research University, Belgorod, Russia, 308015
- Issue: Vol 33 (2025): NO ()
- Pages: 863-866
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journal-nriph.ru/journal/article/view/2289
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.32687/0869-866X-2025-33-s1-863-866
- Cite item
Abstract
The article presents the results of an empirical study on the use of neural network technologies by elderly university teachers representing medical and sociological sciences. The study is based on survey data from 524 academic professionals, with a focus on 60 respondents aged 60 and older. Special attention is given to the comparative analysis of digital activity, engagement with generative AI, and preferred tools (GPT, DeepSeek, GigaChat, etc.). The findings show that medical educators are more likely to use neural networks in research, while sociologists integrate them more into teaching practices. The selection of these two disciplines is justified as representative for analyzing digital adaptation in academia. The article concludes with limitations and directions for future research.
About the authors
E. V. Malinovich
N. A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health, 105064, Moscow, Russia
I. E. Nadutkina
Saint Petersburg State Agrarian University, 196601, Saint Petersburg, Russia; Belgorod State National Research University, Belgorod, Russia, 308015
I. V. Konev
Belgorod State National Research University, Belgorod, Russia, 308015
N. S. Danakin
Belgorod State National Research University, Belgorod, Russia, 308015
References
- Wang F., Casalino L. P., Khullar D. Artificial intelligence in geriatric medicine: challenges and opportunities // J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2023. Vol. 38, N 3. P. 521–529.
- Ienca M., Vayena E. On the responsible use of artificial intelligence in health care // Nat. Med. 2020. Vol. 26. P. 463–464.
- Kim H., Park J., Lee J. The ethics of using artificial intelligence in medical research // Kosin Med. J. 2024. Vol. 39, N 1. P. 16–23.
- Joyce K. E., Selinger E., Cohn M. Toward a sociology of artificial intelligence: a call for research on inequalities and structural change // Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World. 2020. Vol. 6. P. 1–10.
- Park H., Shin S. Y., Lee H. Public perceptions of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a national survey in South Korea // BMC Med. Ethics. 2024. Vol. 25. P. 23. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01052-9
- Schmidt J., Braun M., Blessing L. T. Artificial intelligence in medical care: patients’ perceptions and ethical challenges // J. Med. Ethics. 2023. Vol. 49, N 2. P. 145–152.
