<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1d1" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0869-866X</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2412-2106</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Joint-Stock Company Chicot</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2289</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32687/0869-866X-2025-33-s1-863-866</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Научная статья</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>THE USE OF NEURAL NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES BY TEACHERS OF OLDER AGE GROUPS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF REPRESENTATIVES OF MEDICAL AND SOCIOLOGICAL SCIENCES</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Malinovich</surname><given-names>E. V.</given-names></name><email></email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nadutkina</surname><given-names>I. E.</given-names></name><email></email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-3"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Konev</surname><given-names>I. V.</given-names></name><email></email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-3"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Danakin</surname><given-names>N. S.</given-names></name><email></email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-3"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff-1">N. A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health, 105064, Moscow, Russia</aff><aff id="aff-2">Saint Petersburg State Agrarian University, 196601, Saint Petersburg, Russia</aff><aff id="aff-3">Belgorod State National Research University, Belgorod, Russia, 308015</aff><pub-date date-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2025-08-31" publication-format="electronic"><day>31</day><month>08</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>33</volume><fpage>863</fpage><lpage>866</lpage><history><pub-date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-09-29"><day>29</day><month>09</month><year>2025</year></pub-date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright © 1970,</copyright-statement><copyright-year>1970</copyright-year></permissions><abstract>The article presents the results of an empirical study on the use of neural network technologies by elderly university teachers representing medical and sociological sciences. The study is based on survey data from 524 academic professionals, with a focus on 60 respondents aged 60 and older. Special attention is given to the comparative analysis of digital activity, engagement with generative AI, and preferred tools (GPT, DeepSeek, GigaChat, etc.). The findings show that medical educators are more likely to use neural networks in research, while sociologists integrate them more into teaching practices. The selection of these two disciplines is justified as representative for analyzing digital adaptation in academia. The article concludes with limitations and directions for future research.</abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>neural network technologies</kwd><kwd>elderly educators</kwd><kwd>digital adaptation</kwd><kwd>generative AI</kwd><kwd>medical sciences</kwd><kwd>sociological sciences</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>нейросетевые технологии</kwd><kwd>пожилые преподаватели</kwd><kwd>цифровая адаптация</kwd><kwd>генеративный искусственный интеллект</kwd><kwd>медицинские науки</kwd><kwd>социологические науки</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Wang F., Casalino L. P., Khullar D. Artificial intelligence in geriatric medicine: challenges and opportunities // J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2023. Vol. 38, N 3. P. 521–529.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Ienca M., Vayena E. On the responsible use of artificial intelligence in health care // Nat. Med. 2020. Vol. 26. P. 463–464.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Kim H., Park J., Lee J. The ethics of using artificial intelligence in medical research // Kosin Med. J. 2024. Vol. 39, N 1. P. 16–23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Joyce K. E., Selinger E., Cohn M. Toward a sociology of artificial intelligence: a call for research on inequalities and structural change // Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World. 2020. Vol. 6. P. 1–10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Park H., Shin S. Y., Lee H. Public perceptions of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a national survey in South Korea // BMC Med. Ethics. 2024. Vol. 25. P. 23. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01052-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Schmidt J., Braun M., Blessing L. T. Artificial intelligence in medical care: patients’ perceptions and ethical challenges // J. Med. Ethics. 2023. Vol. 49, N 2. P. 145–152.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
