ASPECTS OF APPLICATION OF DIGITAL SOLUTIONS IN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE

Abstract


All over the world, with regard to digitalization in the provision of primary health care, issues of the principles of the cost-effective resource system for the provision of medical services covering all residents (any category of the population), ways to achieve other goals set for the health system at the territorial or regional level are being discussed. Depending on the main goals and principles set out in national legislation, including legislation in the field of health protection, approaches to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals and, accordingly, approaches to organizing the digitalization of medical care differ in different States. The issues of automating the processes of a medical organization and generating relevant information relate to the ways of using artificial intelligence to free up time for doctors, reduce the administrative burden on medical service providers. The level of digital medical literacy, combined with modern possibilities of remote interaction in the patient-medical worker format, can be decisive at the first stage of seeking medical help — with remote patient triage, which is an indispensable tool for determining both the need for assistance and the urgency of providing assistance. The experience of remote triage of patients by non-medical staff provided by the NHS Pathways clinical decision support system, used by the National Health Service of England, has freed up general practitioners (doctors and nurses) to provide other forms of medical care. In 2005, nurses and, to a lesser extent, general practitioners in England accounted for 100% of the staff handling telephone calls in the similar NHS Direct remote consultation system. The foreign experience of patient teletriage in our country will be limited by the legislation of the Russian Federation in the field of health protection, however, some existing restrictions, taking into account the assessment of risks to patients brought by innovative development, may be revised during the implementation of the «Program of experimental legal regime in the field of digital innovations in the field of medical activity, including the use of telemedicine technologies and technologies for collecting and processing information about the state of health and diagnoses of citizens», which will expire on 08/01/2026.

About the authors

V. E. Andrusov

State budgetary institution of the city of Moscow “Research Institute of Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of the Moscow Health Department” 115088, Moscow, Russian Federation;

D. P. Derbenev

State budgetary institution of the city of Moscow “Research Institute of Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of the Moscow Health Department” 115088, Moscow, Russian Federation;

A. А. Timoshevsky

State budgetary institution of the city of Moscow “Research Institute of Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of the Moscow Health Department” 115088, Moscow, Russian Federation;

Yu. A. Klimov

Russian State Social University, 129226, Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Sheikh A., Anderson M., Albala S. et al. Health information technology and digital innovation for national learning health and care systems // The Lancet. Digit. Health. 2021. Vol. 3, N 6. P. e383—e396. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00005-4
  2. Barron P., Mahomed H., Masilela T. C., Vallabhjee K., Schneider H. District Health System performance in South Africa: are current monitoring systems optimal? // S. Afr. Med. J. 2023. Vol. 113, N 12. P. 13. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2023.v113i12.15527
  3. The World health report 2000. Geneva; 2000. 215 p.
  4. Chioncel O., Čelutkienė J., Bělohlávek J. et al. Heart failure care in the Central and Eastern Europe and Baltic region: status, barriers, and routes to improvement // ESC Heart Fail. 2024. Vol. 11, N 4. P. 1861—1874. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14687
  5. Reddy S. Generative AI in healthcare: an implementation science informed translational path on application, integration and governance // Implement. Sci. 2024. Vol. 19, N 1. P. 27. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01310-9
  6. Вошев Д. В., Сон И. М., Вошева Н. А. и др. Цифровая медицинская грамотность в первичной медико-санитарной помощи: ключевой фактор удовлетворенности пациентов в эпоху цифровой трансформации медицинских услуг // Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика. 2023. Т. 22, № S9. С. 22—28.
  7. Esposito S., Rosafio C., Antodaro F. et al. Use of telemedicine healthcare systems in pediatric assistance at territorial level: consensus document of the Italian Society of Telemedicine (SIT), of the Italian Society of Preventive and Social Pediatrics (SIPPS), of the Italian Society of Pediatric Primary Care (SICuPP), of the Italian Federation of Pediatric Doctors (FIMP) and of the Syndicate of Family Pediatrician Doctors (SIMPeF) // J. Pers. Med. 2023. Vol. 13, N 2. P. 198. doi: 10.3390/jpm13020198
  8. Rushton S., Boggan J. C., Lewinski A. A. et al. Effectiveness of remote triage: a systematic review. Washington; 2019.
  9. Turner J., O’Cathain A., Knowles E., Nicholl J. Impact of the urgent care telephone service NHS 111 pilot sites: a controlled before and after study // BMJ Open. 2013. Vol. 3, N 11. P. e003451. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003451
  10. Bunn F., Byrne G., Kendall S. The effects of telephone consultation and triage on healthcare use and patient satisfaction: a systematic review // Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2005. Vol. 55, N 521. P. 956—961. doi: 10.3399/bjgp05X873200
  11. Тюфилин Д. С., Чигрина В. П., Молоснов А. М. и др. Телемедицина вокруг света: Информационный обзор по правовому регулированию оказания телемедицинских консультаций в формате «врач—пациент». СПб.; 2022. 242 с.
  12. Кобякова О. С., Кадыров Ф. Н. Проблемы развития телемедицинских технологий в России сквозь призму зарубежного опыта // Национальное здравоохранение. 2021. Т. 2, №2. С. 13—20.
  13. Hung M., Lipsky M. S., Phuatrakoon T. N. et al. Teledentistry implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic: scoping review // Interact. J. Med. Res. 2022. Vol. 11, N 2. P. e39955. doi: 10.2196/39955
  14. Ghai S. Teledentistry during COVID-19 pandemic // Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 2020. Vol. 14, N 5. P. 933—935. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.06.095
  15. Гусев А. В., Владзимирский А. В., Голубев Н. А. и др. Информатизация здравоохранения Российской Федерации: история и результаты развития // Национальное здравоохранение. 2021. Т. 2, №3. С. 5—17.
  16. Лебедев Г. С., Шепетовская Н. Л., Решетников В. А. Телемедицина и механизмы ее интеграции // Национальное здравоохранение. 2021. Т. 2, №2. С. 21—27.
  17. Кобякова О. С., Стародубов В. И., Кадыров Ф. Н. и др. Телемедицинские технологии: перспективы и ограничения // Врач и информационные технологии. 2020. № S5. С. 76—85.
  18. Тыров И. А., Токарев А. С., Небытова А. К. и др. Управление изменениями в процессе внедрения цифровых технологий в медицинских организациях стационарного звена: опыт города Москвы // Национальное здравоохранение. 2021. Т. 2, №2. С. 47—54.

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 0

PDF (Russian) - 0

Cited-By


PlumX

Dimensions


Copyright (c) 1970 АО "Шико"

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Mailing Address

Address: 105064, Vorontsovo Pole, 12, Moscow

Email: ttcheglova@gmail.com

Phone: +7 903 671-67-12

Principal Contact

Tatyana Sheglova
Head of the editorial office
FSSBI «N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health»

105064, Vorontsovo Pole st., 12, Moscow


Phone: +7 903 671-67-12
Email: redactor@journal-nriph.ru

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies