THE INFLUENCE OF GENDER, AGE AND LENGTH OF SERVICE ON EDUCATIONAL PREFERENCES OF GENERAL PRACTITIONERS IN RUSSIA

  • Authors: Volnukhin A.V.1,2, Morozova T.E.1,2, Skvirskaya G.P.3,2, Pomytkina T.E.4,2, Zhernakova N.I.5,2, Stremoukhov A.A.6, Zaugolnikova T.V.1,2, Samokhina E.O.1,2, Reze A.G.1,2, Rodkina E.G.1,2
  • Affiliations:
    1. The Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “The I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University” of Minzdrav of Russia (Sechenov University), 119991, Moscow, Russia
    2. The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 119571, Moscow, Russia
    3. The Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education “The Kemerovo State Medical University” of Minzdrav of Russia, 650056, Kemerovo, Russia
    4. The Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “The Belgorod State National Research Institute” of the Minobrnauka of Russia, 308015, Belgorod, Russia
    5. The Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Additional Professional Education “The Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education” of Minzdrav of Russia, 125445, Moscow, Russia
  • Issue: Vol 31, No 4 (2023)
  • Pages: 639-644
  • Section: Articles
  • URL: https://journal-nriph.ru/journal/article/view/1848
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.32687/0869-866X-2023-31-4-639-644
  • Cite item

Abstract


In conditions of active development of medical and pharmaceutical sciences and dynamically changing work environment the education of physician is to be both continuous and personalized. Purpose of the study. To investigate effect of gender, age and work experience on educational needs and on preferences of forms and methods of training in the system of continuing medical education of Russian general practitioners. The research bases were Chairs occupied with issues of personnel training for general medical practice in Moscow, Belgorod and Kemerovo. The sociological, statistical and analytical research methodologies were applied. The overall analysis covered 402 questionnaires for general practitioners. The sampling of respondents included 19.1% of men, 80.9% of women; 52.4% were aged 36—55 (60) years, 29.3% — 24—35 years and 18.3% — 56 (61) years and older; 45.0% had experience in general medical practice up to 2 years, 16.3% — 3—4 years, 27.0% — 5—6 years, 11.7% — 7 or more years. The results of comparative analysis of opinions of physicians of both genders and various age with different time of experience concerning level of significance for practice of various areas of competence within the framework of specialty and their preferences regarding organizational forms, training methods and its duration are presented. It is established that gender, age and length of service had no significant effect on the studied parameters. However, certain characteristics associated with these factors are identified. The further study of possible influence of other internal and external factors can contribute in the future into formulation of scientifically grounded approach to choosing personalized trajectory of education of general practitioner.

About the authors

A. V. Volnukhin

The Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “The I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University” of Minzdrav of Russia (Sechenov University), 119991, Moscow, Russia;

T. E. Morozova

The Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “The I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University” of Minzdrav of Russia (Sechenov University), 119991, Moscow, Russia;

G. P. Skvirskaya

The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 119571, Moscow, Russia;

T. E. Pomytkina

The Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education “The Kemerovo State Medical University” of Minzdrav of Russia, 650056, Kemerovo, Russia;

N. I. Zhernakova

The Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “The Belgorod State National Research Institute” of the Minobrnauka of Russia, 308015, Belgorod, Russia;

A. A. Stremoukhov

The Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Additional Professional Education “The Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education” of Minzdrav of Russia, 125445, Moscow, Russia

T. V. Zaugolnikova

The Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “The I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University” of Minzdrav of Russia (Sechenov University), 119991, Moscow, Russia;

E. O. Samokhina

The Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “The I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University” of Minzdrav of Russia (Sechenov University), 119991, Moscow, Russia;

A. G. Reze

The Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “The I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University” of Minzdrav of Russia (Sechenov University), 119991, Moscow, Russia;

E. G. Rodkina

The Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “The I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University” of Minzdrav of Russia (Sechenov University), 119991, Moscow, Russia;

References

  1. Трегубов В. Н., Сизова Ж. М. Формирование индивидуальной траектории самообразования врача-специалиста в системе непрерывного медицинского образования. Медицинское образование и профессиональное развитие. 2014;4(18):91—9.
  2. Владимирцев В. А. Перспективы развития дополнительного профессионального образования врачей в негосударственных образовательных учреждениях. Russian Journal of Education and Psychology. 2015;10(54):36—48.
  3. Конюхова С. Г., Вагнер В. Д., Майорова Л. В. О повышении медицинскими и фармацевтическими работниками своей квалификации в рамках непрерывного профессионального образования. Клиническая стоматология. 2019;3(91):78—82.
  4. Перетягина Н. Н., Добшикова Г. П. Гендерный подход в целостном образовании: потребность и перспектива развития дополнительного образования. Инновации в образовании. 2014;(5):67—78.
  5. Урусова Л. Х. О гендерных различиях в образовательном процессе. Научные достижения и открытия. 2020;(4):202.
  6. Тарханова И. Ю. Анализ образовательных установок взрослых. Психология образования в поликультурном пространстве. 2014;26:78—83.
  7. Коршунов И. А., Тюнин А. М., Ширкова Н. Н. Как учатся взрослые: факторы выбора образовательных программ. Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2021;(2):286—314.
  8. Калининская А. А., Лазарев А. В., Алленов А. М. Результаты и перспективы реформирования первичной медико-санитарной помощи в Москве. Проблемы социальной гигиены, здравоохранения и истории медицины. 2022;30(2):270—4. doi: 10.32687/0869-866X-2022-30-2-270-274
  9. Ресурсы и деятельность медицинских организаций здравоохранения. I Часть. Медицинские кадры. Департамент мониторинга, анализа и стратегического развития здравоохранения Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации. Центральный научно-исследовательский институт организации и информатизации здравоохранения Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации. М.; 2020. 283 c.
  10. Наркевич А. Н., Виноградов К. А. Методы определения минимально необходимого объема выборки в медицинских исследованиях. Социальные аспекты здоровья населения [сетевое издание]. 2019;65(6):10. doi: 10.21045/2071-5021-2019-65-6-10

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 0

PDF (Russian) - 0

Cited-By


PlumX

Dimensions


Copyright (c) 2023 АО "Шико"

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Mailing Address

Address: 105064, Vorontsovo Pole, 12, Moscow

Email: ttcheglova@gmail.com

Phone: +7 903 671-67-12

Principal Contact

Tatyana Sheglova
Head of the editorial office
FSSBI «N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health»

105064, Vorontsovo Pole st., 12, Moscow


Phone: +7 903 671-67-12
Email: redactor@journal-nriph.ru

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies