THE ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL ISSUES OF SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH OF DEMENTIA PROBLEMS

Abstract


The article analyzes possibilities in sociological research of dementia and social problems it generates. In conditions of increase of unfavorable tendencies related to dementia, occurs decreasing of social status of patients and their relatives tending them, increasing of their socioeconomic maladjustment, deterioration of social and psychological well-being, stigmatization and even social isolation of individuals affected by the problem (including people working with patients with dementia). The dementia results in changes of social identity of patient and one’s relatives, image, quality and standard of living. The caregivers begin to devote less time to themselves and their basic needs. The contradictions in family are becoming more aggravated. The results of surveys demonstrate readiness of many Russians to hypothetically leave in family and provide home caring of diseased relative. The necessity of development of social institutes of curative preventive and social rehabilitative care increases. However, particular difficulties of carrying out sociological surveys of people with dementia that indicates necessity of approbation of special research methodologies. The research methods can vary from mass surveys to depth interview, from analysis of official documents to focus groups. In demand are study of public opinion, expert appraisal, surveys of nearest social environment to identify social risks conditioned by dementia, detection of social groups most affected by its negative impact, analysis of expectations and attitudes of social environment, possibilities of social adaptation and integration in society of those who anyway are affected by the problem, amelioration of their social positioning. of public opinion, expert assessments, surveys of the immediate social environment are in demand in order to highlight the social risks caused by dementia; to identify those social groups that are most susceptible to its negative impact; analysis of expectations and attitudes of the social environment, opportunities for social adaptation and integration into society of all those affected by the problem.

About the authors

D. K. Tanatova

The Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education “The Russian State Social University”, 129226, Moscow, Russia

M. V. Vdovina

The Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education “The Russian State Social University”, 129226, Moscow, Russia

References

  1. World Health Organization. Regional Office for the Western Pacific (2020). Promoting dementia-inclusive communities: a strategic communications toolkit. WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Режим доступа: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/339781/9789290619314-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (дата обращения 01.02.2022).
  2. Деменция. Официальный сайт ВОЗ. Режим доступа: https://www.who.int/ru/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dementia (дата обращения 11.02.2022).
  3. Танатова Д. К., Вдовина М. В., Юдина Т. Н. Cоциальные факторы увеличения продолжительности здоровой жизни (по материалам социологических исследований). Проблемы социальной гигиены, здравоохранения и истории медицины. 2021;29(3):468—73.
  4. Григорьева И. Смена парадигмы в понимании старения. Социологические исследования. 2016;(11):154—5.
  5. Здравомыслова Е., Низамова А. Миры институциональной заботы: совместное проживание и конфликты в пансионате для людей старшего возраста. В кн.: Критическая социология заботы. Е. Бороздина, А. Темкина, Е. Здравомыслова (ред.). СПб.: Издательство ЕУСПб; 2019. С. 217—51.
  6. Смирнова Т., Смирнов Р. Барьеры принятия институциональных форм заботы о пожилых (на примере частных пансионатов). Социологические исследования. 2020;(4):82—93.
  7. Ткач О. «Заботливый дом»: уход за пожилыми родственниками и проблемы совместного проживания. Социологические исследования. 2015;(10):94—102.
  8. Официальный сайт ВЦИОМ. Режим доступа: https://wciom.ru/fileadmin/user_upload/table/table_3773.html (дата обращения 03.02.2022).
  9. День пожилого человека: Аналитический обзор ВЦИОМ. Режим доступа: https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/den-pozhilogo-cheloveka-1 (дата обращения 02.02.2022).
  10. Leporea M., Edvardssonb D., Meyerc J., Igarashid A. How longterm care quality assurance measures address dementia in Australia, England, Japan, and the United States. Aging Health Res. 2021;1(2). doi: 10.1016/j.ahr.2021.100013. Режим доступа: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667032121000111?via%3Dihub (дата обращения 07.02.2022).
  11. Mengyao H., Chenjuan M., Sadarangani T., Bei W. Social-behavioral interventions for Asian and Hispanic American dementia caregivers: An integrative review. Aging Health Res. 2021;1(3). Режим доступа: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667032121000251 (дата обращения 05.02.2022).
  12. Здравомыслова Е., Савченко А. Моральная карьера заботы о родственниках, страдающих деменцией. Laboratorium: журнал социальных исследований. 2020;12(2):90—123.
  13. Goffman E. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Others Inmates. New York: Anchor Books; 1961.
  14. Альшанская М. В., Макушина А. С., Александрова Н. В., Лемиш В. В. Социальные и психологические проблемы людей, осуществляющих уход за родственниками, больными деменцией. Омский психиатрический журнал. 2019;(1):13—5. Режим доступа: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsialnye-i-psihologicheskie-problemy-lyudey-osuschestvlyayuschih-uhod-za-rodstvennikami-bolnymi-dementsiey/viewer (дата обращения 13.02.2022).
  15. Vdovina M. V. Intergenerational Conflicts in Today’s Russian Family. Russian Education and Society. 2006; 48 (4): 82—9.
  16. Галкин К. А. Особенности социологического интервью с пожилыми людьми с деменцией. Опыт травмы. Петербургская социология сегодня. 2021;16:22—43.
  17. Пузин С. Н., Ачкасов Е. Е., Самусенко А. Г., Запарий Н. С. Характеристика ограничений жизнедеятельности инвалидов старше трудоспособного возраста вследствие болезни Паркинсона. Проблемы социальной гигиены, здравоохранения и истории медицины. 2020;28(2):222—6.
  18. Declercq А. (Participant) Observation in Nursing Home Wards for People Suffering from Dementia: The Problems of Trust and Emotional Involvement. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Social Research. 2000;1(1). Режим доступа: https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1135/2529 (дата обращения 15.02.2022).
  19. Van Manen M. Phenomenology of practice: meaning-forming methods in the phenomenological method and writing. Walnut Creek, California: Left Coast Press; 2014.
  20. Van Wijngaarden E., Alma M., The A.-M. “The eyes of others” are what really matters: The experience of living with dementia from an insider perspective. PLoS One. 2019 Apr 3;3. Режим доступа: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0214724 (дата обращения 15.02.2022).

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 8

PDF (Russian) - 5

Cited-By


PlumX

Dimensions


Copyright (c) 2023 АО "Шико"

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Mailing Address

Address: 105064, Vorontsovo Pole, 12, Moscow

Email: ttcheglova@gmail.com

Phone: +7 903 671-67-12

Principal Contact

Tatyana Sheglova
Head of the editorial office
FSSBI «N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health»

105064, Vorontsovo Pole st., 12, Moscow


Phone: +7 903 671-67-12
Email: redactor@journal-nriph.ru

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies