SPECIFIC FOREIGN TOOLS FOR ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF PATIENTS WITH COPD

Abstract


Introduction. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) usually have a decreased quality of life (QOL). Specialized questionnaires on QOL may be more sensitive when studying individual issues of COPD therapy than general (universal) questionnaires. Goal. Conducting a review of specific tools for assessing the quality of life of patients with COPD. Materials and methods. The study was carried out based on the results of a search of scientific literature presented in the bibliographic databases PubMed (USA) and ELIBRARY.RU (Russia, Russian-language sources). Keywords were used to search for relevant sources: «quality of life», «COPD», «chronic obstructive pulmonary disease» etc. In order to search for information on individual questionnaires, queries containing the names of the questionnaires were used. Additional references were obtained using the search engines Google and Yandex. Results. Based on the results of a study of the scientific literature and a search in the PubMed / Medline information base, 22 specific tests used to assess the quality of life of patients with COPD were considered. These tests demonstrate different relevance and scientific applicability in recent years. Five tests were most often used in foreign and domestic studies: St. George respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ), the COPD assessment test (CAT), the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (mMRC), the chronic respiratory questionnaire (CRQ), the clinical COPD questionnaire (CCQ). Conclusion. Further study as well as local adaptation (if so required) of some questionnaires will open up new opportunities for their wider implementation into the routine daily practice of providing medical care to patients with COPD in the regions.

About the authors

D. A. Andreev

Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of Moscow Healthcare Department, 115088, Moscow, Russia

N. N. Kamynina

Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of Moscow Healthcare Department, 115088, Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Wan C., Yang Z., Zhao Z. et al. Development and preliminary validation of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease scale quality of life instruments for chronic diseases-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease based on classical test theory and generalizability theory // Chron. Respir. Dis. 2022. Vol. 19. P. 147997312211040. doi: 10.1177/14799731221104099
  2. Wacker M. E., Jörres R. A., Karch A. et al. Assessing health-related quality of life in COPD: comparing generic and disease-specific instruments with focus on comorbidities // BMC Pulm. Med. 2016. Vol. 16. P. 70. doi: 10.1186/s12890-016-0238-9
  3. Jones P. W., Harding G., Berry P. et al. Development and first validation of the COPD Assessment Test // Eur. Respir. J. 2009. Vol. 34. P. 648—654. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00102509
  4. Weldam S. W.M., Schuurmans M. J., Liu R., Lammers J.-W. J. Evaluation of Quality of Life instruments for use in COPD care and research: a systematic review // Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2013. Vol. 50. P. 688—707. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.07.017
  5. Hsu K.-Y., Lin J.-R., Lin M.-S. et al. The modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale is a good indicator of health-related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease // Singapore Med. J. 2013. Vol. 54. P. 321—327. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2013125
  6. Farver-Vestergaard I., Rubio-Rask S., Timm S. et al. Disease-specific anxiety in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: translation and initial validation of a questionnaire // Front. Psychol. 2022. Vol. 13. P. 907939. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.907939
  7. Guyatt G. H., Berman L. B., Townsend M. et al. A measure of quality of life for clinical trials in chronic lung disease // Thorax. 1987. Vol. 42. P. 773—778. doi: 10.1136/thx.42.10.773
  8. Chauvin A., Rupley L., Meyers K. et al. Outcomes in Cardiopulmonary Physical Therapy: Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ) // Cardiopulm. Phys. Ther. J. 2008. Vol. 19. P. 61—67.
  9. Jo Y. S., Park S., Kim D. K. et al. The cutoff point of clinical chronic obstructive pulmonary disease questionnaire for more symptomatic patients // BMC Pulm. Med. 2018. Vol. 18. P. 38. doi: 10.1186/s12890-018-0601-0
  10. Perez T., Burgel P. R., Paillasseur J.-L. et al. Modified Medical Research Council scale vs Baseline Dyspnea Index to evaluate dyspnea in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease // Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2015. Vol. 10. P. 1663—1672. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S82408
  11. Romano J., Ribeiro P., Alberto J. et al. A prospective study of patients with persistent symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection referred to physical medicine and rehabilitation // Acta Med. Port. 2023. Vol. 36. P. 639—646. doi: 10.20344/amp.19382
  12. Windisch W., Freidel K., Schucher B. et al. The Severe Respiratory Insufficiency (SRI) Questionnaire: a specific measure of health-related quality of life in patients receiving home mechanical ventilation // J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2003. Vol. 56. P. 752—759. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00088-X
  13. Hajiro T., Nishimura K., Jones P. W. et al. A novel, short, and simple questionnaire to measure health-related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease // Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1999. Vol. 159. P. 1874—1878. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.159.6.9807097
  14. Lareau S. C., Meek P. M., Roos P. J. Development and testing of the modified version of the Pulmonary Functional Status and Dyspnea Questionnaire (PFSDQ-M) // Heart Lung. 1998. Vol. 27. P. 159—168. doi: 10.1016/S0147-9563(98)90003-6
  15. Ninot G., Soyez F., Préfaut C. A short questionnaire for the assessment of quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: psychometric properties of VQ11 // Health Qual. Life Outcomes. 2013. Vol. 11. P. 179. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-179
  16. Perez T., Arnould B., Grosbois J.-M. et al. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of a new short Visual Simplified Respiratory Questionnaire (VSRQ) for health-related quality of life assessment in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease // Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2009. Vol. 4. P. 9—18.
  17. Tu S.-P., Fihn S. D., McDonell M. B. et al. A new self-administered questionnaire to monitor health-related quality of life in patients with COPD // Chest. 1997. Vol. 112. P. 614—622. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.3.614
  18. Kühl K., Kuhn C., Kenn K. et al. Der COPD-Angst-Fragebogen (CAF): Ein neues Instrument zur Erfassung krankheitsspezifischer Ängste bei COPD-Patienten // Psychother. Psychosom. Med. Psychol. 2011. Vol. 61. P. e1—9. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1248281
  19. Duiverman M. L., Wempe J. B., Bladder G. et al. Health-related quality of life in COPD patients with chronic respiratory failure // Eur. Respir. J. 2008. Vol. 32. P. 379—386. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00163607
  20. McKenna S. P., Meads D. M., Doward L. C. et al. Development and validation of the living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease questionnaire // Qual. Life Res. 2011. Vol. 20. P. 1043—1052. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9850-6
  21. Maillé A. R., Koning C. J.M., Zwinderman A. H. et al. The development of the «Quality-of-Life for Respiratory Illness Questionnaire (QOL-RIQ)»: a disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with mild to moderate chronic non-specific lung disease // Respir. Med. 1997. Vol. 91. P. 297—309. doi: 10.1016/S0954-6111(97)90034-2
  22. Pakhale S., Wood-Dauphinee S., Spahija A. et al. Validation of a new questionnaire with generic and disease-specific qualities: the McGill COPD Quality of Life Questionnaire // Can. Respir. J. 2012. Vol. 19. P. 367—372. doi: 10.1155/2012/914138
  23. Stavem K., Erikssen J., Boe J. Performance of a short lung-specific health status measure in outpatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease // Respir. Med. 1999. Vol. 93. P. 467—475. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(99)90089-6

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 0

PDF (Russian) - 0

Cited-By


PlumX

Dimensions


Copyright (c) 1970 АО "Шико"

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Mailing Address

Address: 105064, Vorontsovo Pole, 12, Moscow

Email: ttcheglova@gmail.com

Phone: +7 903 671-67-12

Principal Contact

Tatyana Sheglova
Head of the editorial office
FSSBI «N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health»

105064, Vorontsovo Pole st., 12, Moscow


Phone: +7 903 671-67-12
Email: redactor@journal-nriph.ru

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies