The abortion and contraceptive behavior: results of the all-Russian Research

Abstract


The problem of abortion is actual in all spheres of public life. Despite the fact that in Russia, according to the Ministry of Health, the number of abortions has decreased by 30% over the past five years, there is demand from society and public authorities to strengthen the national demographic security, to search for corresponding reserves and to strengthen positive dynamics of demographic indices on permanent long-term basis. The abortions significantly and negatively affect birth rate and woman health. To make proper managerial decisions in this area requires analyzing such complex social phenomenon as abortion behavior and its alternatives, including contraceptive behavior based on family planning technologies.The purpose of study is to analyze characteristics of abortive and contraceptive behavior and their relationship with matrimonial and reproductive behavior in Russia to strengthen national demographic security.The official public data of Rosstat, Minzdrav of Russia, etc. was used. Also the data of the All-Russian sociological study “Demographic well-being of Russia” was attracted. The methodology included questionnaire survey in late 2019 - early 2020 carried out in 10 Subjects of the Russian Federation: Moscow, Republic of Bashkortostan, Republic of Tatarstan, Vologda Oblast, Volgograd Oblast, Ivanovo Oblast, etc. The total sampling consisted of 5 616 respondents. The study implemented such scientific research methods as: analysis, synthesis, generalization, statistical analysis, sociological analysis.The state policy implementation related to the decrees of the President of the Russian Federation “On measures to implement the Demographic Policy of the Russian Federation” (2012): “On national goals and strategic objectives of the development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2024” (2018, national project “Demography”), Government orders “On approval of the Concept of State family Policy in the Russian Federation for the period up to 2025” (2014), “On the basics of State youth policy of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2025” (2014), etc. On national level, it resulted in decreasing of the number of abortions and increasing attention of society and the public authorities to problems of the family. in Russia, since 2007, the absolute number of abortions has been declining, and from 2015 to the present, the absolute number of abortions has decreased below the millionth value. The leaders in positive rate of abortions decreasing are the North Caucasus, the Central and Southern Federal Okrugs. The higher rates of abortions remain In the Far Eastern, Siberian and Ural Federal Okrugs. It is established that abortion and reproductive behavior depends on aging of motherhood, low contraceptive culture at early start of sexual life and various social economic factors. A significant part of Russian population is characterized by low awareness of reproduction issues and contraceptives. The study revealed certain relationship between contraceptive and matrimonial and reproductive behavior. The hypothesis was confirmed for the Republics of Bashkortostan and Tatarstan. The additional research in this area is required to identify effective measures to fully implement demographic potential of the Russian family. Even though the official statistics of Russia indicate positive trends in population abortion behavior, abortions make up significant part of reproductive losses. For majority of Russians, abortion remains acceptable mean of regulating childbearing. Russia has the highest rate of abortions in the age ranges of 30-34 and 35-39 years.In Russia, improvement of medical and contraceptive literacy and formation of responsible health self-attitude will increase quality of life, implement population's demographic potential and improve demographic security.

Full Text

Introduction The basis of this study are the works in which the causes of the evolution of childbearing norms are identified, and the types of demographic behavior are classified (R. I. Akyulov [1], A. I. Antonov [2], V. N. Arkhangelsky [3; 4; 5], A. G. Vishnevsky [6; 7], T. Frejka [7], L. L. Rybakovsky [8], N. E. Rusanova [9; 10], V. I. Sakevich [11], etc.), researched trends in socio-demographic policy in the Russian Federation. (V. N. Arkhangelsky [12], A. G. Vishnevsky [13], N. V. Zvereva [14; 15], G. I. Klimantova [16; 17], N. M. Rimashevskaya [18], L. L. Rybakovsky [19], E. I. Kholostova [17], etc.). The essential characteristic of a social community is demographic behavior, in the implementation of which social, economic, environmental, medical, and other conditions play a role. Demographic behavior is understood as a system of interrelated and interdependent actions of the subject aimed at maintaining or changing its demographic state. As elements of demographic behavior, modern researchers usually consider such components as: matrimonial (from lat. matrimonialis - «marriage», «marital») - marital behavior; reproductive (from lat. re, again, producere to output, i.e., reproductive) - Behavior that mediates the birth or refusal to give birth to a child in marriage or out of wedlock, self-preserving (sanitary, vital) behavior aimed at maintaining health throughout the entire life cycle. Without a doubt, one of the significant factors determining demographic behavior is health, both public (social) and individual. Demographic behavior is influenced by the demographic attitudes of the population, which determine the number of children, the birth rate, and public health. The authors, highlighting the factors and conditions for the formation of demographic attitudes, note the special role of socio-demographic policy, under which the requirements for the implementation of the demographic behavior of the population are formed. That is why it is essential to work out the results of the implementation of socio-demographic policy to identify the effectiveness of its directions, including reproductive behavior. Abortion and contraceptive behavior are distinguished structurally within the framework of reproductive behavior. At the same time, abortion behavior is understood as actions aimed at preventing an unwanted birth, and contraceptive behavior is understood as actions aimed at preventing conception. Abortion-contraceptive behavior serves as a tool for regulating both a specific reproductive cycle (aimed at preventing conception or terminating a pregnancy with the help of an induced abortion), and the entire reproductive cycle of the family (aimed at forming pitiable protogenetic and intergenetic intervals - the periods between the start of marital relations and the birth of the first child and intervals between births of subsequent children). Abortion-contraceptive behavior, the parameters we consider in this article, ensures the regulation of the number of children in the family. No less significant in modern family planning is the possibility of using, availability both at the present time and the subjective perception of the possibility of using assisted reproductive technologies in the future - infertility treatment methods, in the application of which some or all stages of conception and early development of embryos are carried out outside the mother's body. Methods The following scientific methods were used in the study: 1.Statistical. Using absolute and relative indicators characterizing abortion-contraceptive behavior's dynamics and regional differentiation. Analysis of data from Rosstat and departmental statistics of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation on the number of abortions, the age structure of women who have had abortions, etc. 2.Sociological. The paper analyzes the All-Russian sociological survey «Demographic well-being of Russia,» conducted by the method of questionnaire survey at the end of 2019 - beginning of 2020 in ten subjects of Russia. The data obtained make it possible to reveal the peculiarities of the abortion-contraceptive behavior of the population. Sample parameters are presented in Table 1. ps202203.4htm00017.jpg Nine out of ten regions completed the survey within the given parameters, providing individual representation and analyzing trends for regional objectives. In general, the sex and age composition of the sample corresponds to the general population. The male to female ratio is 1:1, representing the reproductive age population. The settlement section is observed; 80% is the urban population in the sample, and 20% is the rural population. Young people under 30 years old - 39%, from 30 to 40 years old - 34%, from 40 to 49 years old - 27%. Results Abortion refers to the artificial termination of pregnancy, which, in accordance with Art. 56 of the Federal Law of November 21, 2011, No. 323-FL (as amended on December 22, 2020), “Based on Protecting the Health of Citizens in the Russian Federation,” is carried out with a gestational age of up to twelve weeks 6. Russian researcher N. F. Prokhorenko notes that “…statistical registration of cases of abortion cannot be absolutely reliable in any country in the world», since «abortion of pregnancy at early and very early stages … is close to natural physiological processes and often occurs before the fact of registration of pregnancy» [20]. To assess the dynamics of abortions in Russia, we use the total number of abortions: both at the request of a woman, for medical or social reasons, and due to miscarriages, when pregnancy could be desired [20]. In connection with this aspect, it is necessary to separate dangerous abortions, associated with the desire of a woman to terminate an unwanted pregnancy, and spontaneous abortions - miscarriages related to the inability of a woman to bear a pregnancy due to her unexpected termination. The scale and dynamics of abortion in Russia. The efforts of society and the state to eliminate the «demographic catastrophe» 7 had a positive impact on the dynamics of abortions. Since 2007, the absolute abortion rates have decreased, and the number of births has begun to exceed the number of abortions. According to the data of the Federal State Statistics Service, as well as the Federal State Budgetary Institution «Central Research Institute for the Organization and Informatization of Healthcare» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, since 2015, the absolute number of abortions has fallen below one million, having retained it to the present. That is, the total number of abortions over 15 years has decreased by three times, or by 66% (Fig. 1). The number of abortions per 1000 women of childbearing age decreased by 2.5 times - from 38.2 in 2005 to 15.1 in 2019 (Fig. 2). ps202203.4htm00019.jpg There were 35.9 abortions per 100 births (live and dead) in 2019, almost three times lower than in 2005 (Fig. 3). Based on the UN classification, the average abortion rate per 1,000 women in the country by 2019 can be called low 8. Along with the decrease in the total number of abortions, there is a decrease in the absolute number of abortions of primigravidas. Such an indicator as the ratio of abortions in primigravidas to the total number of abortions shows a consistent decrease from 2005 until 2017 and an increase in 2018-2019. For the years presented in the study materials, the average percentage of spontaneous abortions to their total number is 18.9%. In our opinion, the minimization of spontaneous abortions their prevention in the early stages is a necessary measure to preserve the desired pregnancy. Without a doubt, the efforts of medical workers to prevent abortions should first of all aim at protecting this pregnancy. The share of medical (legal) abortions is slightly more than half of the total abortions. The share of criminal abortions is 0.03% as of 2019. Since 2012, as a social indication for abortion, it has been the result of a crime under Article 131 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation 9. There is a tendency to reduce the number of abortions for social reasons. Regional features of the spread of abortions. From 2005 to the present, the dynamics of the decline in abortions have shown positive trends, but its rates are different in the federal districts. The top three in terms of positive rates of reduction in abortions are the North Caucasus, Central, and Southern federal districts. At the same time, negative trends, and the persistence of high rates of abortions in the Far East and Ural Federal Districts cannot but be alarming (Fig. 4, 5). The results of a questionnaire survey conducted in the All-Russian sociological survey «Demographic well-being of Russia» in 2019-2020 in ten constituent entities of Russia (n=5616 people) also indicate that termination of pregnancy remains a widely used method of regulating childbearing. The proportion of women with a history of abortion before marriage was 16%. In the Ivanovo region, a third of women terminated their pregnancy before marriage, a quarter - in the Volgograd region, 20% in the Nizhny Novgorod region, and 19% in the Sverdlovsk region (Table 2). The proportion of women who terminated pregnancy before the birth of their first child is less - 9%. However, between the first and second, a quarter of women had already terminated their pregnancy, and 27% between the second and third. This is a serious problem, probably due to the aging of motherhood and low contraceptive culture with a relatively early onset of sexual activity. Referring to the data of earlier regional studies [22], attention should be paid to early unprotected sexual intercourse before the age of 17, which leads to unwanted pregnancies that lead to abortion. Low awareness of the population in matters of reproduction is typical for a significant part of Russians. For example, studies conducted in the Vologda Oblast show that about 50% of people of reproductive age lack information on reproductive behavior, 13% have intermittent, casual sexual contacts, while 12% of them do not use any contraceptives. It also increases the risk of unwanted pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections [22]. The use of contraceptives allows you to plan a pregnancy and prevent its unwanted appearance, which can be eliminated through abortion. The task of contraceptive behavior is to regulate the number and time of the appearance of children. Currently, discussions continue about the effectiveness of contraceptive methods and the fight against their side effects [23]. The official statistics of the Russian Federation to assess the degree of abortion prevention uses an assessment of the use by women of contraceptives such as intrauterine devices (IUDs) and hormonal contraception. However, in Russia, hormonal contraception, as well as the use of intrauterine devices (IUDs), are not widely used, as evidenced by official statistics (Table 3) [24]. Meanwhile, hormonal contraception and IUDs to prevent unwanted pregnancy are more often used in the Siberian, Urals, Far Eastern, and Volga federal districts, which are also characterized by high abortion behavior. However, more frequent contraceptives by women in these federal districts are not reflected positively in decreasing the number of abortions in these regions. On the contrary, these federal districts are anti-leaders in terms of the number of abortions performed in Russia, which may indicate both an insufficient attitude of the population of the regions that make up these federal districts to the effective use of contraceptive methods and to the preservation of a pregnancy that has already occurred. This may be due to the low level of contraceptive culture of the population, insufficient awareness of family planning and the role of contraception in this process, the high cost of modern contraceptives, distrust of them (due to ignorance of the rules for their use and the degree of impact on health), unwillingness of husbands to use contraceptives by their wives, etc. Also, the socio-economic conditions of life of Russian families in these regions need special assessment; it is necessary to clarify regional programs aimed at supporting motherhood, fatherhood, childhood, family, and youth policy. ps202203.4htm00021.jpg We will study the relationship of contraceptive behavior with matrimonial and reproductive. It is logical to assume that contraception is used to a greater extent after the realization of reproductive intentions and before the decision to have the first child. ps202203.4htm00023.jpg An analysis of the results of the All-Russian sociological survey «Demographic well-being of Russia» shows that according to the proportion of those who were protected in the protogenetic interval (the time interval between marriage and before the birth of the first child), contraceptive behavior is related to matrimonial and reproductive. Thus, in regions where the share of those oriented towards official marriage and its conclusion before or immediately from the beginning of a joint life is more represented, a greater orientation towards the first child's birth is also likely, i.e., lack of contraception in the protogenetic interval. The hypothesis was confirmed for the Republics of Bashkortostan and Tatarstan (Table 4). In the intergenetic interval (the interval between successive births), 48% reported the use of contraception: between the first and second - 64%, between the second and third 54%, 70% were protected after the birth of the youngest last baby (Table 2). These data may indicate the problem of postponing children's birth by Russian families. There is no doubt that the abortion and contraceptive behavior of Russians needs to be assessed and develop adequate management mechanisms based on the values of an officially registered marriage a healthy children's family, considering regional specifics and local culture. It becomes pretty obvious: when correcting abortion-contraceptive behavior, it is necessary to consider social, economic, cultural, psychological (motivational, behavioral, etc.) criteria of a non-medical nature and retaining that contraceptives are prescribed considering medical indications and contraindications to them. Therefore, we can talk about the effectiveness of a particular contraceptive concerning a single family or woman. Discussion The official statistics of the Russian Federation show positive trends in the abortion behavior of the population. At the same time, solid regional differentiation remains due to both socio-economic and socio-cultural factors. This is confirmed by the results of other studies, for example, N. E. Rusanova, in her works, also concludes that “… abortions as an element of reproductive regulation in Russia demonstrate a steady downward trend. Public condemnation and contraception are gradually moving to a modern structure that contributes to preserving and correcting individual reproductive capabilities (the intrauterine device is slowly losing popularity; modern hormonal contraceptives are increasingly used). The author notes that for Russia, where traditional ineffective methods of child regulation, the acceptability of abortions, and a lack of knowledge about emergency contraception are still widely preserved, such trends are significant [25]. However, there are other opinions that official data may be underestimated since they do not consider the distribution of abortion pills in Russia since the 2000s. These pills can be bought by women illegally, for abortion at home, or prescribed by doctors in private clinics. In 2015, the head of the Union of Pediatricians of Russia, Alexander Baranov, at a press conference on the issue of removing abortions from the compulsory medical insurance system, emphasized that “… in Russia, according to experts, there are from three to four million abortions per year, performed, primarily in private clinics” [26]. Thus, we can talk about underestimated official abortion statistics in Russia. And we can confidently say that for the majority of Russians, the acceptability of abortion as a way to regulate childbearing remains [27]. Considering the foreign experience of the prevalence of abortions, V. I. Sakevich notes that in European countries, young unmarried girls who resort to them to delay the birth of their first children more often use abortions, while in Russia, women regulate the number of children or the size of the intergenetic interval with the help of abortions to a greater extent. Perhaps due to the earlier age of family formation and children's birth in Russia. The study also notes that Russia has the highest rate of abortions in 30-34 and 35-39 years and is comparable to the level of prosperous countries in terms of teenage abortions [28]. The use of abortion to regulate childbearing is primarily due to the population's awareness and medical literacy. For example, the Vologda Oblast's mandatory pre-and post-abortion counseling for women, active educational work in vocational education institutions on this topic, social advertising, and the involvement of public organizations 10 made it possible to reduce the proportion of young girls who terminated pregnancy by abortion by four times [29]. Conclusion Abortions make up a significant part of reproductive losses [30]. At present, the contribution of regulation of abortion behavior to population growth cannot be overestimated, since it is quantitatively small, but improving medical and contraceptive literacy and the formation of a responsible attitude towards one's health will undoubtedly contribute to improving the quality of life. For the demographic policy of Russia, the formation in society of the value of a prosperous family, in which the birth of both the first and subsequent children is not delayed, and pregnancies are not interrupted, is important. It is necessary to carry out additional scientific research in this area to identify effective measures aimed at a more complete realization of the demographic potential of the Russian family. It is necessary to consider another very important point regarding the significance of abortion behavior in the context of population conservation. Therefore, for all levels of national, regional, municipal government, the formation of tasks to regulate the reproductive behavior of the population is required.

About the authors

T. K. Rostovskaya

The Institute for Demographic Research of the Federal State Budget Institution of Science “The Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of The Russian Academy of Sciences”

Email: rostovskaya.tamara@mail.ru

A. A. Shabunova

The Vologda Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences


E. A. Knyazkova

The Institute for Demographic Research of the Federal State Budget Institution of Science “The Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of The Russian Academy of Sciences”


Afzali Mehdi

The Institute for Demographic Research of the Federal State Budget Institution of Science “The Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of The Russian Academy of Sciences”


References

  1. Akyulov R. I. Reproductive behavior of young people in the conditions of transformation of the family institution. In: Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific Conference “Management of social Changes in unstable conditions”. Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State University; 2016. P. 516-24 (in Russian).
  2. Antonov A. I., Karpova V. M., Lyalikova S. V., Novoselova E. N., Sinelnikov A. B. The values of the family and child lifestyle (GRAY-2019), ed. Moscow: MAKS Press; 2020. 486 p. (in Russian).
  3. Arkhangelskii V. N. Forecasting of birth rate on the basis of indicators for real generations. In: Social Processes of modern Russia.International Scientific and Practical Conference. Nizhny Novgorod; 2020. P. 518-23 (in Russian).
  4. Arkhangelskii V. N., Kalachikova O. N. Maternal age at first birth: dynamics, regional differences, determination. Economic and Social Change: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2020;13(5):200-17.
  5. Arkhangelskii V. N., Shulgin S. G., Zinkina Yu. V. Reproductive behavior of Russian women depending on their educational status. Bulletin of the Peoples ' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Sociology. 2020;20(3):546-59 (in Russian).
  6. Vishnevsky A. G. Demographic transition and the problem of demographic self-regulation. Answer to A. B. Sinelnikov. Sociological Journal. 2019;25(4):93-104 (in Russian).
  7. Frejka T., Gietel-Basten S., Abolina L. Zvidrins P., Abuladze L., Puur A., et al. Fertility and family policies in Central and Eastern Europe after 1990.Comparative population studies. 2016;41(1):3-56.
  8. Rybakovsky L. L. Productivity as the main indicator of the assessment of the state and trends of fertility. Sociological research. 2016;4(384):23-30 (in Russian).
  9. Rusanova N. E. Childless family in Russia: State policy and choice of spouses. Labor and social relations. 2009;(8):91-7 (in Russian).
  10. Rusanova N. E. Dynamics of reproductive health and prospects for increasing the birth rate in Russia. In: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference “Health as a Resource: V. 2.0”. Under the general Ed. of Z. H. Saralieva. Nizhny Novgorod; 2019. P. 180-2 (in Russian).
  11. Sakevich V. I. The prohibition of abortion has little effect on its prevalence. Stork on the roof. Demographic Magazine. 2016;1(1):36-40 (in Russian).
  12. Arkhangelsky V. N., Zinkina Yu. V., Korotaev A. V., Shulgin S. G. Modern trends in the birth rate in Russia and the impact of state support measures. Sociological research. 2017;3(395):43-50 (in Russian).
  13. Vishnevsky A. G. On fertility, mortality, forecasts and migration. Journal of the New Economic Association. 2011;9(9):174-6 (in Russian).
  14. Zvereva N. V., Arkhangelsky V. N. The system of values of young people and the role of demographic policy in increasing the birth rate (based on the results of the All-Russian study of youth). Federalism. 2007;2(46):155-72 (in Russian).
  15. Zvereva N. V. Challenges and ways to solve the problems of fertility in Russia. In: Modeling of demographic development and socio-economic efficiency of the implementation of the demographic policy of Russia. Materials of the international scientific and practical conference. Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Institute of Socio-Political Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2015. P. 282-8 (in Russian).
  16. Klimantova G. I. Social policy: family, demographics, child. Moscow: RHYTHM; 2016. 146 p. (in Russian).
  17. Kholostova E. I., Klimantova G. I. Encyclopedia of social practices that support families and children in the Russian Federation. Moscow: Dashkov and Co.; 2015 (in Russian).
  18. Rimashevskaya N. M. Three proposals for the improvement of demographic and family policy. Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast. 2013;6(30):127-32 (in Russian).
  19. Rybakovsky L. L. The concept of demographic policy of Russia: development experience and ways to improve. Sociological research. 2015;9(377):62-70 (in Russian).
  20. Prokhorenko N. F. Demographic potential: additional aspects. GORZDRAV: news, opinions, training. Herald of VOSE. 2019;5(2):22-47 (in Russian).
  21. Riazantsev S. V., Rostovskaya T. K., Sigareva E. P., Sivoplyasova S. Yu. Abortions and abortive behavior in the context of the search for reserves of demographic development in Russia. Human ecology. 2019;(7):17-23 (in Russian).
  22. Shabunova A. A., Kalachikova O. N. Reproductive health as a factor of population reproduction quality. Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast. 2009;3(7):73-81 (in Russian).
  23. Selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use. 2nd ed. World Health Organization; 2005.
  24. Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Department of Monitoring, Analysis and Strategic Development of Health Care, Federal State Budgetary Institution “Central Research Institute of Organization and Informatization of Health Care” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. The main indicators of maternal and child health, the activities of the child protection service. Moscow; 2020 (in Russian).
  25. Rusanova N. E. Family planning in Russia today: abortion or IVF? In. National demographic priorities: new approaches, trends. Ser. “Demography. Sociology. Economy”. Eds Riazantseva S. V., Rostovskaya T. C. Moscow; 2019. P. 312-315 (in Russian).
  26. Yakovleva E. Chief pediatrician of Russia called the “real” number of abortions in the Russian Federation. Available at: https://rg.ru/2015/06/04/abort-site.html (accessed 06.02.2021).
  27. Kalachikova O. N., Shabunova A. A. Reproductive health and behavioral factors of its formation (based on the materials of a sociological study in the Vologda Oblast). Problems of territory development. 2016;(1):115-29 (in Russian).
  28. Sakevich V. I., Denisov B. P. Reproductive health of the population and the problem of abortion in Russia: the latest trends. Sociological research. 2019;(11):140-51 (in Russian).
  29. Kalachikova O. N. The use of information methods of influence on the reproductive behavior of the population. In: Proceedings of the international scientific and practical conference “Socio-political prospects for the development of the state and society in the context of globalization”. Kharkiv; 2012. P. 80-4 (in Russian).
  30. Kalachikova O. N., Shabunova A. A. Analysis of lost economic benefits from reproductive losses. Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 6: Economics. 2012;(5):86-97 (in Russian).

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 105

PDF (Russian) - 38

Cited-By


PlumX

Dimensions


Copyright (c) 2022 АО "Шико"

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Mailing Address

Address: 105064, Vorontsovo Pole, 12, Moscow

Email: ttcheglova@gmail.com

Phone: +7 (495) 916-29-60

Principal Contact

Tatyana Sheglova
Head of the editorial office
FSSBI «N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health»

105064, Vorontsovo Pole st., 12, Moscow


Phone: +7 (495) 916-29-60
Email: redactor@journal-nriph.ru

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies