THE MEDICAL SOCIAL ASPECTS OF TRAUMATISM RELATED TO APPLICATION OF TOOLS OF INDIVIDUAL MOBILITY IN MEGALOPOLIS OF MOSCOW

  • Authors: Liadova A.V.1, Liadova M.V.2, Bystrenko V.Y.2
  • Affiliations:
    1. The Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education "The M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University", 119991, Moscow, Russia
    2. The Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education "N. I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University)" of Minzdrav of Russia, 117997, Moscow, Russia
  • Issue: Vol 34, No 1 (2026)
  • Pages: 55-61
  • Section: Articles
  • URL: https://journal-nriph.ru/journal/article/view/2524
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.32687/0869-866X-2026-34-1-55-61
  • Cite item

Abstract


In Moscow, implementation of means of personal mobility became a solution of the "last mile" problem by reducing costs of transposition. However, their popularity augments traumatism and is accompanied by increasing of traffic accidents. The purpose of the study is to identify medical social characteristics of traumatism at traffic accidents involving means of personal mobility. The means of personal mobility, resolving "last mile" problem become source of health risk because of lacking of safety culture, corresponding municipal infrastructure and legal gaps. The comprehensive approach to injury prevention is minimizing risks, contributes to increasing of safety of urban mobility.

About the authors

A. V. Liadova

The Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education "The M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University", 119991, Moscow, Russia

M. V. Liadova

The Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education "N. I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University)" of Minzdrav of Russia, 117997, Moscow, Russia

V. Yu. Bystrenko

The Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education "N. I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University)" of Minzdrav of Russia, 117997, Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Завьялов Д. В. Концепция устойчивой мобильности в современных мегаполисах. МИР (Модернизация. Инновации. Развитие). 2021;12(3):288—305. doi: 10.18184/2079-4665.2021.12.3. 288-305
  2. Калинин В. С. Стратегическое значение инновационных кластеров Москвы в развитии прогрессивной транспортной инфраструктуры мегаполиса. Стратегирование: теория и практика. 2024;4(2):274—83. doi: 10.21603/2782-2435-2024-4-2-274-283
  3. Ляхов П. В., Лопарев Е. А. Аварийность с участием средств индивидуальной мобильности, оснащенных электродвигателем. Безопасность дорожного движения. 2022;(1):35—41.
  4. Астафьев С. А., Астафьева П. С. Влияние средств индивидуальной мобильности на повышение комфортности городской среды. Вестник Томского государственного архитектурно-строительного университета. 2024;26(1):70—82. doi: 10.31675/1607-1859-2024-26-1-70-82
  5. Хасанов Т. И. Анализ правонарушений, совершенных с использованием средств индивидуальной мобильности. Закон и право. 2024;(10):257—61. doi: 10.24412/2073-3313-2024-10-257-261
  6. Дронова О. Б. Средства индивидуальной мобильности как источник повышенной опасности в механизме дорожно-транспортного происшествия. Правовое государство: теория и практика. 2024;76(2):31—6. doi: 10.33184/pravgos-2024.2.4
  7. Дорожно-транспортная аварийность в Российской Федерации в 2023 году. Информационно-аналитический обзор. М.: ФКУ «НЦ БДД МВД России»; 2024. 154 с.
  8. Дорожно-транспортная аварийность в Российской Федерации за 9 месяцев 2024 года. Информационно-аналитический обзор. М.: ФКУ «НЦ БДД МВД России»; 2024. 41 с.
  9. Съедин М. С., Плис С. С., Клевно В. А. Электросамокаты и ассоциированный травматизм: судебно-медицинские аспекты. Судебная медицина. 2022; 8(4):77—88. doi: 10.17816/fm758
  10. Tan A. L., Nadkarni N., Wong T. H. The price of personal mobility: burden of injury and mortality from personal mobility devices in Singapore: a nationwide cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:880. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7210-6
  11. Ang K. X. The Orthopedic Injury Burden of Personal Mobility Devices in Singapore — Our Experience in the East Coast. J. Clin. Orthopaed. Trauma. 2021;13:66—9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.08.015
  12. Yoon J. H., Jeon H. B., Kang D. H., Kim H. Facial injury burden of personal mobility devices: a single center retrospective analysis. Arch. Craniofac. Surg. 2022;23(4):163—70. doi: 10.7181/acfs.2022.00801
  13. Kim J. Y., Lee S. C., Lee S., Lee C. A., Ahn K. O., Park J. O. Characteristics of injuries according to types of personal mobility devices in a multicenter emergency department from 2011 to 2017: A cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;12;100(6):e24642. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024642
  14. Trivedi T. K., Liu C., Antonio A. L. M. Injuries associated with standing electric scooter use. JAMA Netw. Open. 2019;2:e187381. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7381
  15. Cruz N. D., Morgan C., Morgan R. V., Tanna S. Injury patterns of e-scooter-related orthopaedic trauma in central London: a multicentre study. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2021;104(3):187—94. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0151
  16. Laverdet C., Pala P., Meyer T. Crashes Involving Electric Personal Mobility Devices (ePMD) Reported by the French Police: Types of Crashes, Users Involved, Injuries and Explanatory Factors. Res. Square. 2023 Apr 13. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2801940/v1
  17. European Road Safety Observatory Road Safety Thematic Report Personal Mobility Devices. Brussles, Begium; 2021.
  18. Osti N., Aboud A., Gumbs S., Engdahl R., Carryl S., Donaldson B. E-scooter and E-bike injury pattern profile in an inner-city trauma center in upper Manhattan. Injury. 2023;54(5):1392—5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.02.054
  19. Ступак В. В., Назаров Ж. А., Фонин В. В., Зарубин М. Н., Вардосанидзе В. К., Долженко Д. А. Клинический случай сочетанного повреждения головного и спинного мозга при использовании электросамоката. Политравма. 2023;(3):45—51.
  20. Niemann M., Braun K., Otto E., Tiefenbrunner M. Dangers of e-mobility: A systematic review and meta-analysis of sustained injury patterns and injury severity. Safety Science. 2023;167. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106283
  21. Vallmuur K., Mitchell G., McCreanor V. Electric personal Mobility Devices Surveillance (E-MODES) study: Injury presentations to emergency departments in Brisbane, Queensland. Injury. 2023;54(6):1524—31. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.04.036
  22. Carlsson A., Lundälv J. Acute injuries resulting from accidents involving powered mobility devices (PMDs)-Development and outcomes of PMD-related accidents in Sweden. Traffic Injury Prevent. 2019;20(2):484—91. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1606910

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 0

PDF (Russian) - 0

Cited-By


PlumX

Dimensions


Copyright (c) 2026 АО "Шико"

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Mailing Address

Address: 105064, Vorontsovo Pole, 12, Moscow

Email: ttcheglova@gmail.com

Phone: +7 903 671-67-12

Principal Contact

Tatyana Sheglova
Head of the editorial office
FSSBI «N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health»

105064, Vorontsovo Pole st., 12, Moscow


Phone: +7 903 671-67-12
Email: redactor@journal-nriph.ru

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies