MAIN PROBLEMS AFFECTING THE FORMATION OF THE WELL BEING OF YOUNG RUSSIAN FAMILIES: ACCORDING TO THE RESULTS OF THE ALL RUSSIAN SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH

Abstract


The paper presents the findings of a study conducted using a mass questionnaire survey of members of young families (n = 893). The purpose of the study is to identify what problems affecting well being are faced by members of young families. In the sample, young families are represented by two groups — families with children and families without children. It was revealed that the assessment of the significance of problems in family life is different in families with children and childless families, including the number of children in the family that affects the situation. Ratings of family problems were built according to the following criteria — self assessment of men and women and parenting experience. It is concluded that, according to a number of criteria (both material and non material), well being is formed.

About the authors

T. K. Rostovskaya

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 119333, Moscow, Russia

E. N. Vasilyeva

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 119333, Moscow, Russia

M. Afzali

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 119333, Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Vishnevsky A. G. Theoretical and methodological approaches to resolving the contradictions between national goals and national projects Nauchnyye trudy Vol’nogoekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii = Scientific works of the Free Economic Society of Russia. 2019;217(3):100–19 (in Russian).
  2. Osipov G. V., Ryazantsev S. V. Demographic Policy in Russia: Transformation, Results, Prospects. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk = Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2014;84(11):963–72 (in Russian).
  3. Ilyin V. А., Shabunova A. A., Kalachikova O. N. The Potential of Increasing Fertility and Family and Demographic Policy of Russia. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk = Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2021;91(9):831–44. doi: 10.31857/S0869587321090048 (in Russian).
  4. Buttner T., Lutz W. Estimating fertility responses to policy measures in the German Democratic Republic. Populat. Devel. Rev. 1990;16(3):539–55. doi: 10.2307/1972835
  5. Hoem J. M. Overview chapter 8: The impact of public policies on European fertility. Demogr. Res. 2008;19(10):249–60. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.10
  6. Tan P. L., Morgan S. P., Zagheni E. A. Case for "Reverse One Child" Policies in Japan and South Korea? Examining the Link Between Education Costs and Lowest Low Fertility. Populat. Res. Policy Rev. 2016;35(3):327–50. doi: 10.1007/s11113-016-9390-4
  7. Bognar G. Overpopulation and Procreative Liberty. Ethics Policy Environ. 2019;22(3):319–30. doi: 10.1080/21550085.2019.1652232
  8. Bergsvik J., Fauske A., Hart R. K. Can Policies Stall the Fertility Fall? A Systematic Review of the (Quasi ) Experimental Literature. Populat. Devel. Rev. 2021;47(4):913–64. doi: 10.1111/padr.12431
  9. Artamonova A. V. Changes in Family Formation Trajectories among Russians and Factors for such Changes. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal = Sociological Journal. 2018;24(2):110–34. doi: 10.19181/socjour.2018.24.2.5847 (in Russian).
  10. Arkhangelskiy V. N. Fertility in Real Generations of Russian Women: Trends and Regional Differences. Еkonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, Taxes & Law. 2019;12(2):59–69 (in Russian).
  11. Isupova O. G. Population and family policy in different countries: conceptual approaches and practices. Demograficheskoe obozrenie = Demographic Review. 2020;7(3):51–83. doi: 10.17323/demreview.v7i3.11636 (in Russian).
  12. Rostovskaya T. K., Kuchmaeva O. V. Transformation of the desired family model in different generations: Results of the All Russian sociological study. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya = RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2020;20(3):527–45. doi: 10.22363/2313 2272 2020 20 3 527 545 (in Russian).
  13. Antonov A. I., Lebed O. L., Sokolov A. A. Life satisfaction, family and marriage in Russia and Europe. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny = Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2010;3(97):64–72 (in Russian).
  14. Klimantova G. I. State family policy of modern Russia: prospects and social risks. Social'naya politika i sociologiya. 2008;(6):23–31 (in Russian).
  15. Rostovskaya T. K., Kuchmayeva O. V. Imagery of the young russian people about family life: sociological aspect. Voprosy upravleniya. 2015;(3):85–90 (in Russian).

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 0

PDF (Russian) - 0

Cited-By


PlumX

Dimensions


Copyright (c) 2023 АО "Шико"

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Mailing Address

Address: 105064, Vorontsovo Pole, 12, Moscow

Email: ttcheglova@gmail.com

Phone: +7 903 671-67-12

Principal Contact

Tatyana Sheglova
Head of the editorial office
FSSBI «N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health»

105064, Vorontsovo Pole st., 12, Moscow


Phone: +7 903 671-67-12
Email: redactor@journal-nriph.ru

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies