<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1d1" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0869-866X</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2412-2106</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Joint-Stock Company Chicot</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">918</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32687/0869-866X-2022-30-3-442-447</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Научная статья</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>The physicians and the patients: who are they one to another?</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Amlaev</surname><given-names>K. R.</given-names></name><bio></bio><email>kum672002@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bakunts</surname><given-names>S. A.</given-names></name><bio></bio><email>-</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mazharov</surname><given-names>V. N.</given-names></name><bio></bio><email>-</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff-1">The Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education “The Stavropol State Medical University” of the Minzdrav of Russia</aff><pub-date date-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2022-12-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>442</fpage><lpage>447</lpage><history><pub-date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2022-06-18"><day>18</day><month>06</month><year>2022</year></pub-date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright © 2022,</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year></permissions><abstract>The article considers issues of communication between physicians and patients and presents several models of corresponding relationships. The importance of involving patients in therapeutic partnership is emphasized. The barriers to effective communication between physician and patient and ways to overcome them are considered. The attention is paid to rules of effective listening to patients. The problem of receiving from patients their informed consent for particular procedures is considered, including rules of effective conducting “difficult conversation”.</abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>relationship</kwd><kwd>communication</kwd><kwd>physician</kwd><kwd>patient</kwd><kwd>informed consent</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>коммуникации врачей и пациентов</kwd><kwd>партнерские отношения</kwd><kwd>информированное согласие</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Brédart A., Bouleuc C., Dolbeault S. Doctor-patient communication and satisfaction with care in oncology. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 2005;17(14):351-4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Ocloo J., Garfield S., Franklin B. D. Exploring the theory, barriers and enablers for patient and public involvement across health, social care and patient safety: a systematic review of reviews. Health Res. Policy Syst. 2021;19(1):8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Evans D. Extent, quality and impact of patient and public involvement in antimicrobial drug development research: a systematic review. Health Expect. 2018;21:75-81.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Chuah F. L. H.Community participation in general health initiatives in high and uppermiddle income countries: A systematic review exploring the nature of participation, use of theories, contextual drivers and power relations in community participation. Soc. Sci. Med. 2018;213:106-22.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Brunton G. Narratives of community engagement: a systematic review-derived conceptual framework for public health interventions. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:944.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Vaughn L. M., Garfield S., Franklin B. D. Partnering with insiders: a review of peer models across community-engaged research, education and social care. Health Soc. Care Commun. 2018;26:769-86.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Castro C. M. Babel babble: physicians' use of unclarified medical jargon with patients. Am. J. Health Behav. 2007;31(1):85-95.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Larson E. B., Yao X. Clinical Empathy as Emotional Labor in the Patient-Physician Relationship. JAMA. 2005;293(9):1100-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Mao Y. The Therapeutic Relationship in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18:3460.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Ivers N. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012;6:CD000259.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Levy A. G., Scherer A. M., Zikmund-Fisher B. J. Prevalence of and Factors Associated with Patient Nondisclosure of Medically Relevant Information to Clinicians. JAMA Netw. Open. 2018;1(7):e185293.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Ali M.Communication skills 2: overcoming barriers to effective communication. Nursing Times. 2017;114:40-2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>13.World Health Organization.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Adherence to long-term therapies: Evidence for action. Switzerland: WHO Library Cataloguing; 2003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Davis K. Room for improvement: Patients report on the quality of their health care. New York: Commonwealth Fund; 2002. 9 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Thiedke C. C. What do we really know about patient satisfaction? Fam. Pract. Manag. 2007;14(1):33-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Lein C., Wills C. E. Using patient-centered interviewing skills to manage complex patient encounters in primary care. Am. Acad. Nurse Pract. 2007;19:215-20.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Levinson W., Gorawara-Bhat R., Lamb J. A Study of Patient Clues and Physician Responses in Primary Care and Surgical Settings. JAMA. 2000;284(8):1021-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Street R. L., Haidet P. How Well Do Doctors Know their Patients? Factors Affecting Physician Understanding of Patients’ Health Beliefs. J. Gen.Intern. Med. 2011;26:21-7.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
