Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of MedicineProblems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine0869-866X2412-2106Joint-Stock Company Chicot74010.32687/0869-866X-2021-29-s2-1324-1330Научная статьяFORMATION OF THE NOTION OF «QUALITY OF LIFE», CONCEPTUALISATION AND METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS (LITERATURE REVIEW)PivovarovaO. A.pivovarovaoa1@zdrav.mos.ruPotemkinaR. A.-RusanovaN. E.-Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of Moscow Healthcare DepartmentInstitution of Science Institute of Socio-Economic Studies of Population, Russian Academy of Sciences1512202129S21324133023112021Copyright © 2021,2021Quality of life (QoL) is an important health outcome and represents the primary aim of all medical interventions. The term QoL has been is frequently used in medical and philosophical literature in recent decades and has become an important concept and goal of public health research.Traditionally, biomedical results rather than QoL were the basic endpoints in clinical and public health research.However, recent research is increasingly focusing on the study of QoL in patients and the making use of QoL assessment has increased considerably. The concept of QoL has led to extensive research and has been used by the professional medical community in the treatment of a broad array of diseases.Literature search methods included database searches Scopus, Web of Science, MedLine, the Cochrane Library.Historical trends in the concept of QoL are discussed in this article and issues related to the conceptual and methodological aspects of constructing QoL in the context of health care.quality of lifereviewconceptmethodologyкачество жизниобзорконцепцияметодология1.Haraldstad K., Wahl A., Andenaes R., Andersen J. R. et al. A systematic review of quality of life research in medicine and health sciences // Qual. Life Res. 2019. Vol. 28, N 10. P. 2641-2650. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02214-9.2.Olsen J. A., Misajon R. A conceptual map of health-related quality of life dimensions: key lessons for a new instrument // Qual. Life Res. 2020. Vol. 29, N 3: 733-743. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02341-3.3.Устав (Конституция) Всемирной организации здравоохранения // Основные документы. 48-е изд. Женева: ВОЗ, 2014. С. 1-26.4.Long P. H. On the quantity and quality of life // Med. Times. 1960. Vol. 88. P. 613-619.5.Elkington J. R. Medicine and the quality of life // Ann. Intern. Med. 1966. Vol. 64. P. 711-714.6.Wood-Dauphinee S. Assessing quality of life in clinical research from where have we come and where are we going? // J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1999. Vol. 52, N 4. P. 355-363. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00179-6.7.US National Library of Medicine - Mesh Glossary, Quality of life, URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez.8.Awad G., Voruganti L. N. Intervention research in psychosis: issues related to the assessment of quality of life // Schizophr. Bull. 2000. Vol. 26, N 3. P. 557-564. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033477.9.Pennacchini M., Bertolaso M., Elvira M. M., De Marinis M. G. A brief history of the Quality of Life: its use in medicine and in philosophy // Clin. Ter. 2011. Vol. 162, N 3. P. e99-e103.10.Costa Neto S. B. Qualidade de vida dos portadores de câncer de cabeça e pescoço. Tese de Doutorado. Brasília: Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de Brasília, 2002.11.Farquhar M. Definitions of quality of life: a taxonomy // J. Adv. Nurs. 1995. Vol. 22, N 3. P. 502-508. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22030502.x.12.Gill T. M., Feinstein A. R. A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements // JAMA. 1994. Vol. 272, N 8. P. 619-626.13.Bowling A., Brazier J. Quality of life in social science and medicine-- introduction // Soc. Sci. Med. 1995. Vol. 41. P. 1337-1338.14.Rogerson R. J. Environmental and health-related quality of life: conceptual and methodological similarities // Soc. Sci. Med. 1995. Vol. 41, N 10. P. 1373-1382. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00122-n.15.Schuttinga J. A. Quality of life from a federal regulatory perspective // Quality of life in behavioral medicine research / eds. J. E. Dimsdale, A. Baum. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,1995. P. 31-42.16.Pais-Ribeiro J. L. Quality of life is a primary end-point in clinical settings // Clin. Nutr. 2004. Vol. 23, N 1. P. 121-130. DOI: 10.1016/s0261-5614(03)00109-2.17.Wulff H. The two cultures of medicine. Objective facts versus subjectivity and values // J. R. Soc. Med. 1999. Vol. 92, N 11. P. 549-552. DOI: 10.1177/014107689909201101.18.Holmes S. Assessing the quality of lifeóreality or impossible dream? A discussion paper // Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2005. Vol. 42, N 4. P. 493-501.19.Leplége A., Hunt S. The problem of quality of life in medicine // JAMA. 1997. Vol. 278, N 1. P. 47-50. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1997.03550010061041.20.Ventegodt S., Merrick J., Andersen N. J. Measurement of quality of life III. From the IQOL theory to the global, generic SEQOL questionnaire // Sci. World J. 2003. Vol. 3. P. 972-991. DOI: 10.1100/tsw.2003.77.21.The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization // Soc. Sci. Med. 1995. Vol. 41, N 10. P. 1403-1409. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00112-k.22.The WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties // Soc. Sci. Med. 1998. Vol. 46, N 12. P. 1569-1585. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00009-4.23.Ware J. E, Kosinski M., Keller E. D. The SF-36 Physical and Mental Summary Scales: a user's manual. Boston: The Health Institute, 1993.24.World Health Organization. Quality of life assessment: an annotated bibliography. Geneva: WHO, 1994.25.Rubin R. R., Peyrot M. Quality of life and diabetes. Diabetes metabolism // Res. Rev. 1999. Vol. 15, N 3. P. 205-218.26.Albany N. Y. A study of the medical needs of recipients of old age assistance in New York City in 1934. N.Y., 1937.27.Criteria Committee of the New York Heart Association. Nomenclature and criteria for diagnosis of diseases of the heart. N.Y., 1939.28.Visick A. H. A study of the failures after gastrectomy // Ann. R. Coll. Surg. 1948. Vol. 3, N 5. P. 266-284.29.Zeman F. D. The functional capacity of the aged: its estimation and practical importance // J. Mount Sinai Hosp. 1947. Vol. 14, N 3. P. 721-728.30.Karnofsky D. A, Burchenal J. H. The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer // Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents / ed. C. M. Macleod. N.Y.: Columbia University Press, 1948.31.Moskowitz E., McCann C. B. Classification of disability in the chronically ill and aging // J. Chron. Dis. 1957. Vol. 5, N 3. P. 342-346. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(57)90092-9.32.Physical standards and instruction for the medical examination of serving soldiers and recruits for the Canadian Army. 1943. 132 p.33.U. S. Army Reg. No. 40-115; Department of the Army, 1948.34.Staff of the Benjamin Rose Hospital. Multidisciplinary study of illness in aged persons I // J. Chron. Dis. 1958. Vol. 7, N 4. P. 332-345.35.Staff of the Benjamin Rose Hospital. Multidisciplinary study of illness in aged persons II // J. Chron. Dis. 1959. Vol. 9, N 1. P. 55-62.36.Mahoney F. I., Wood O. H., Barthel D. W. Rehabilitation of chronically ill patients: the influence of complications on the final goal // Southern Med. J. 1958. Vol. 51, N 5. P. 605-609. DOI: 10.1097/00007611-195805000-00011.37.Zubrod C. G., Schneiderman M., Frei E. et al. Appraisal of methods for the study of chemotherapy of cancer in man: comparative therapeutic trial of nitrogen mustard and triethylene thiophosphoramide-// J. Chron. Dis. 1960. Vol. 11, N 1. P. 7-33.38.Lawton M. P., Brody E. M. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living // Gerontologist. 1969. Vol. 9, N 3. P. 179-186.39.Lo B., Jonsen A. R. Clinical decisions to limit treatment // Ann. Intern. Med. 1980. Vol. 93, N 5. P. 764-768.40.Smith G. P. Triage: endgame realities // J. Contemp. Health Law Policy. 1985. Vol. 1, N 1. P. 143-151.41.Bushore M. Emergency Care on the child // Pediatrics. 1987. Vol. 79, N 4. P. 572-576.42.Weinstein M. C. Economic assessments of medical practices and technologies // Med. Decis. Making. 1981. Vol. 1, N 4. P. 309-330.43.Selby P. J., Chapman J. A., Etazadi-Amoli J. et al. The development of a method for assessing the quality of life of cancer patients // Br. J. Cancer. 1984. Vol. 50, N 1. P. 13-22.44.Frank-Stromborg M. Selecting an instrument to measure quality of life // Oncol. Nurs. Forum. 1984. Vol. 11, N 5. P. 88-91.45.Schipper H. Why measure quality of life // Med. Canc. Assoc. J. 1983. Vol. 128, N 12. P. 1367-1370.46.Garrat A., Schmidt L., Mackintosh A., Fitzpatrick R. Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures // Br. Med. J. 2002. Vol. 324, N 7351. P. 1417-1419. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7351.1417.47.Guyatt G. H., Feeny D. H., Patrick D. L. Measuring health-related quality of life // Ann. Intern. Med. 1993. Vol. 118, N 8. P. 622-629. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-118-8-199304150-00009.48.Farquhar M. Definitions of quality of life: a taxonomy // J. Adv. Nurs. 1995. Vol. 22, N 3. P. 502-508. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22030502.x.49.Bowling A. What things are important in people's lives? A survey of the public's judgements to inform scales of health related quality of life // Soc. Sci. Med. 1995. Vol. 41, N 10. P. 1447-1462.50.Gill T. M., Alvan M. D., Feinstein M. D. A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements // JAMA. 1994. Vol. 272, N 8. P. 619-626.51.Groenvold M., Klee M. C., Sprangers M. A., Aaronson N. K. Validation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 Quality of Life Questionnaire through combined qualitative and quantitative assessment of patient-observer agreement // J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1997. Vol. 50, N 4. P. 441-450.52.Wood-Dauphinee S. Assessing quality of life in clinical research from where have we come and where are we going? // J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1999. Vol. 52, N 4. P. 355-363.53.Labbrozzi D. Misure di salute e di vita. Roma: Il Pensiero Scientifico Editore, 1995.54.Gill T. M., Feistein A. R. A critical appraisal of quality of life measures // JAMA. 1994. Vol. 272, N 8. P. 619-626.