Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of MedicineProblems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine0869-866X2412-2106Joint-Stock Company Chicot69310.32687/0869-866X-2021-29-5-1111-1116Научная статьяThe family demographic policy in the context of population reproduction: the country-specific reviewRostovskayaT. K.rostovskaya.tamara@mail.ruVasilievaE. N.-SizikovaV. V.-BerezaN. A.-The Institute for Demographic Research of the Federal Research Sociological Center of The Russian Academy of SciencesThe Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education “The Moscow State University of Technology ‘STANKIN’”The Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “The Volgograd State University”The Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education “The Russian State Social University” of Minobrnauka of The Russia151020212951111111622102021Copyright © 2021,2021The purpose of the study is to systematize theoretical models of demographic family policy approved in publications included into database SCOPUS in 2019-2020 and developed using empirical data obtained by analysis of methods and practices of increasing natality in certain countries of EU, BRICS and the New World. The France, Sweden, Great Britain, Norway and Denmark are oriented to expand measures of social support of citizen and regulation of occupation of women with children with purpose to increase natality. In the countries of South-Western Asia and North Africa the measures are targeted to decreasing level of natality and to implement family planning policy.demographic policyfertilitypopulationsocial supportsocial policygenderemploymentcемейно-демографическая политикачисленность населениявоспроизводство населениярождаемостьмеры социальной поддержкисоциальная политикагендерзанятость[Опыт осуществления демографической политики в зарубежных странах. Страсть в социологии. Режим доступа: http://www.sociologymania.ru/smpgs-497-1.html][Zhou M., Kan M. Y. A new family equilibrium? Changing dynamics between the gender division of labor and fertility in Great Britain, 1991-2017. Demogr. Res. 2019;40:1455-500. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2019.40.50][Scott J., Clery E. Gender roles: An incomplete revolution? In: Park A., Bryson C., Clery E., Curtice J., Phillips M., eds. British social attitudes: The 30th report. London: National Centre for Social Research; 2013. P. 115-38. Режим доступа: http://www.bsa.natcen.ac.uk/media/38457/bsa30_gender_roles_final.pdf][Beaujouan E., Berghammer C. The Gap Between Lifetime Fertility Intentions and Completed Fertility in Europe and the United States: A Cohort Approach. Popul. Res. Policy Rev. 2019;38:507-35. doi: 10.1007/s11113-019-09516-3][Beaujouan E., Solaz A. Is the Family Size of Parents and Children Still Related? Revisiting the Cross-Generational Relationship Over the Last Century. Demography. 2019;56:595-619. doi: 10.1007/s13524-019-00767-5][Ediev D., Mamolo M., Potancokova M., Sobotka T., Zeman K. European demographic datasheet 2012. Vienna, Austria: Wittgenstein Centre (IIASA, VID/OEAW, WU). 2012. Режим доступа: https://www.oeaw.ac.at/en/vid/data/demographic-data-sheets/european-demographic-data-sheet-2012/][Lesthaeghe R. J. The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Populat. Devel. Rev. 2010;36:211-51.][Lebano A., Jamieson L. Childbearing in Italy and Spain: Postponement Narratives. Populat. Devel. Rev. 2020;46(1):121-44.][Ciritel A. A., De Rose A., Felice M. Arezzo Childbearing intentions in a low fertility context: the case of Romania. Genus. 2019;75:4. doi: 10.1186/s41118-018-0046-6][Duvander A.-Z., Johansson M. Does Fathers’ Care Spill Over? Evaluating Reforms in the Swedish Parental Leave Program. Feminist Economics. 2019;25(2):67-89. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2018.1474240][Rehel E. M. When Dad Stays Home Too: Paternity Leave, Gender, andParenting. Gender Soc. 2014;28(1):110-32.][Duvander A., Lappegard T., Johansson M. Impact of a Reform Towards Shared Parental Leave on Continued Fertility in Norway and Sweden. Popul. Res. Policy Rev. 2020. doi: 10.1007/s11113-020-09574-y][Wood J., Neels K. Does Mothers’ Parental Leave Uptake Stimulate Continued Employment and Family Formation? Evid. Belg. Soc. Sci. 2019;8:292. doi: 10.3390/socsci8100292][Yamaguchi S. Effects of Parental Leave Policies on Female Career and Fertility Choices. Quantitative Economic. 2019;10(3):1195-232. doi.org/10.3982/QE965][Djundeva M., Dykstra P. A., Emery T. Family dynamics in China and Europe in the last half-century. Chin. J. Sociol. 2019;5(2):143-72. doi: 10.1177/2057150X19836368][Esping-Andersen G., Palier B. Trois Leçons sur l’État-Providence. Paris: Seuil; 2008.][Reeskens T., van Oorschot W. Equity, Equality or Need? Explaining Preferences towards Welfare Redistribution Principles across 23 European Countries. Valencia, 8-10 Sept 2011.][Чистякова А. Франции нужны дети. Политика пронатализма во Франции. Демоскоп Weekly. 2009;(3):377-8. Режим доступа: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2009/0377/student03.php][База данных по семье и семейной политике ОЭСР. Режим доступа: https://www.oecd.org/els/family/database.htm]