<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1d1" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0869-866X</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2412-2106</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Joint-Stock Company Chicot</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">613</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32687/0869-866X-2021-29-s1-736-742</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Научная статья</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>THE ATTITUDE OF RUSSIANS TO VACCINATION AGAINST COVID-19: PROBLEMS AND CONTRADICTIONS</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bogomiagkova</surname><given-names>E. S.</given-names></name><bio></bio><email>e.bogomyagkova@spbu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff-1">Saint-Petersburg State University</aff><pub-date date-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2021-06-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>06</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>29</volume><issue>S1</issue><fpage>736</fpage><lpage>742</lpage><history><pub-date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2021-08-05"><day>05</day><month>08</month><year>2021</year></pub-date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright © 2021,</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year></permissions><abstract>Despite the unfolding of the COVID-19 pandemic, the rate of involvement of Russians in vaccination remains low, which makes the study of attitudes to this technology particularly relevant. Based on the results of the author's empirical research and data from mass surveys of the Foundation “Public Opinion” and All-Russian Center for the Study of Public Opinion, the article assesses the attitude of residents of our country to immunoprophylaxis against coronavirus. The study revealed that vaccination attitudes are a continuum, and the perception of vaccination against a new virus is associated in Russians with seasonal flu shots, and not with the National Vaccination Calendar. Today, the attitude towards immunoprophylaxis against COVID-19 in Russia can be characterized as distrust of a specific vaccine and approval of vaccination in general as an effective technology for combating epidemics. The key strategy is «waiting», and the choice of a personal trajectory of health care is driven by a broader trend of individualization and transformation of traditional social ties.</abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>COVID-19</kwd><kwd>COVID-19</kwd><kwd>vaccination</kwd><kwd>anti-vaccination</kwd><kwd>in-depth interviews</kwd><kwd>social attitudes</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>вакцинация</kwd><kwd>антивакцинаторство</kwd><kwd>глубинные интервью</kwd><kwd>социальные установки</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Кубарь О. И., Микиртичан Г. Л., Асатрян А. Ж. Этическая концепция противодействия антивакцинальному движению // Биоэтика. 2018. Т. 3, № 1. С. 41-48.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Мац А. Н. Современные истоки антипрививочных измышлений и идеологии // Эпидемиология и вакцинопрофилактика. 2013. № 3. С. 90-97.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Keelan J., Pavri-Garcia V., Tomlinson G., Wilson K. YouTube as a source of information on immunization: a content analysis // JAMA. 2007. Vol. 298, N 21. P. 2482-2484. DOI: 10.1001/jama.298.21.2482</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Teoh D. The power of social media for HPV vaccination - not fake news! // Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book. 2019. Vol. 39. P. 75-78. DOI: 10.1200/EDBK_239363</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Kata A. Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm - an overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement // Vaccine. 2012. Vol. 30, N 25. P. 3778-3789. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Лескова И. В., Зязин С. Ю. Недоверие к вакцинации как информационный вброс // Проблемы социальной гигиены, здравоохранения и истории медицины. 2021. Т. 29, № 1. С. 37-40. DOI: 10.32687/0869-866X-2021-29-1-37-40</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Богдан И. В., Гурылина М. В., Чистякова Н. П. Основы просветительской работы на тему вакцинации в сети Интернет: «рациональные» сторонники и «эмоциональные противники // Проблемы социальной гигиены, здравоохранения и истории медицины. 2019. Т. 27, № 6. С. 1038-1042. DOI: 10.32687/0869-866X-2019-27-6-1038-1042</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Бауман З. Текучая современность. СПб.: Питер, 2008. 240 с.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
