<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1d1" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0869-866X</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2412-2106</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Joint-Stock Company Chicot</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">342</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32687/0869-866X-2020-28-4-627-631</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Научная статья</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>The regional experience of implementation of program of prevention of abortions with non-medical indications</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chuchalina</surname><given-names>T. V.</given-names></name><bio></bio><email>-</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Casparova</surname><given-names>A. E.</given-names></name><bio></bio><email>-</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mescheriakov</surname><given-names>V. V.</given-names></name><bio></bio><email>maryvitaly@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kovalenko</surname><given-names>L. V.</given-names></name><bio></bio><email>-</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff-1">The Budget Institution of Higher Education “The Surgut State University”</aff><pub-date date-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2020-12-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>627</fpage><lpage>631</lpage><history><pub-date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2021-04-06"><day>06</day><month>04</month><year>2021</year></pub-date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright © 2020,</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year></permissions><abstract>The unfavorable demographic situation in the Russian Federation determines need of developing medical, organizational and social technologies for preventing abortions because of non-medical reasons. The purpose of the study was to analyze consensus opinion of physicians about reasons women refusing to continue pregnancy, to establish directions of preventing abortions and to evaluate efficiency of the Municipal Competition “Life is sacred gift”, the initiative of the All-Russian Program “Sanctity of Motherhood”. The study applied such sociological technique as questionnaire survey of 20 obstetricians gynecologists about causes of miscarriage and main directions of prevention of abortion. The analysis was implemented of dynamics of rate of abortions during last 5 years before the introduction of innovative program of prevention of abortion with participation of physicians, psychologists, representatives of public and religious organizations in the form of the competition “Life is sacred gift” (2006-2010) and in program implementation (2012 -2016 GG.) Also were applied the concordance technique, the Fisher's angular transform and rank correlation. The consistency of opinions of physicians about place of lacking of knowledge about risks of abortion and reproductive health in woman decision making about abortion (W = 0.32; χ² = 44.8; p &lt;0.001), about motivation of preserving pregnancy as the main focus on non-medical abortion prevention (W = 0.33; χ² = 33.3; p &lt;0.001). The implementation of innovation program permitted to increase percentage of women who refused abortion from 3.3% to 17.5% (p &lt;0.01), to reduce number of non-medical abortions from 37.9 to 16.9 per 100 births, and from 17,5 to 10.5 per 1000 women of fertile age (p &lt;0.01). The implementation of innovative program increases effectiveness of standard interventions to prevent abortions.</abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>fertile health</kwd><kwd>abortion</kwd><kwd>prevention</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>фертильное здоровье</kwd><kwd>аборты</kwd><kwd>профилактика</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Шелехов И. Л., Берестнева О. Г., Ясюкевич Ю. В. Анализ факторов, определяющих демографическую ситуацию в Сибирском федеральном округе. Бюллетень ВСНЦ СО РАМН. 2013;3(91):131-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Стребков А. И., Шевякова А. М. Конфликтология абортов: об их разнообразии и способах преодоления. StatusPraesens. 2017;2(38):17-26.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Руднева М. В., Картавенко Е. В. Исследование особенностей переживания вины, сознательно прервавших беременность. Личность, семья и общество: вопросы педагогики и психологии. 2014;41:140-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Психологическое доабортное консультирование. Методические рекомендации. М.: Центр общественных инициатив; 2009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Позиция Минздрава России по вопросу исключения абортов из ОМС. Режим доступа: https://www.rosminzdrav.ru/news/2016/09/28/3178-pozitsiya-minzdrava-rossii-po-voprosu-isklyucheniya-abortov-iz-oms (дата обращения 28.05.2019).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Полунин В. С., Полунина Н. В., Буслаева Г. Н., Турбина Ю. О. Социально-гигиенические аспекты профилактики абортов. Проблемы социальной гигиены, здравоохранения и истории медицины. 2018;26(3):148-50.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Чижова Г. В., Дьяченко В. Г., Шиганцова Н. В. Мотивации женщин к принятию решения о производстве аборта. Здравоохранение Дальнего Востока. 2014;3(61):28-31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Здравоохранение в России 2017. Статистический сборник. М.: Росстат; 2017.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Радзинский В. Е. Акушерская агрессия. М.: StatusPraesens; 2011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Каспарова А. Э. Городской конкурс «Жизнь - священный дар». Вестник СурГУ. Медицина. 2012;(12):34-40.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Саламатова Т. В., Мещеряков В. В. «Клиника, дружественная к молодежи» как инновационная организационная форма медико-социальной помощи подросткам. Проблемы социальной гигиены, здравоохранения и истории медицины. 2016;24(1):11-58.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Применение методов экспертных оценок в научных исследованиях и в практической деятельности: учебное пособие для послевузовской подготовки врачей. И. П. Аpтюхова (ред.). Красноярск: КрасГМА; 2008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Шиган Е. Н. Методы прогнозирования и моделирования в социально-гигиенических исследованиях. М.: Медицина; 1986.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Реброва О. Ю. Статистический анализ медицинских данных. Применение прикладных программ STATISTICA. М.: МедиаСфера; 2002.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
