Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of MedicineProblems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine0869-866X2412-2106Joint-Stock Company Chicot33510.32687/0869-866X-2020-28-4-592-595Научная статьяThe analysis of factors effecting professional self-assessment of physiciansBakirovA. B.-NazarovaL. Sh.lilinaz19@mail.ruBakirovaB. A.-AbdrakhmanovaE. R.-KalimullinaD. Kh.-AkhmetzianovaE. Kh.-GimaevaZ. F.-The Federal Budget Institution of Science “The Ufa State Medical University” Minzdrav of RussiaThe Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education “The Bashkir State Medical University” of Minzdrav of Russia1512202028459259506042021Copyright © 2020,2020To explore the factors potentially related to professional self-assessment of physicians, sociological survey on the basis of sampling of 223 respondents who underwent professional training in 2017 was organized. The physicians with the first qualification category more often assessed themselves as “good” than other respondents (p=0.049). On the contrary, physicians with no qualification category rated their work as “good” less often and as “satisfactory” more often than other respondents (p=0.041 and p=0.010, respectively). The rate of professional self-assessment as “excellent” significantly increased among physicians identifying themselves with highest stratum of society (p=0.00034). Statistically significant differences in age, total duration of service in profession between physicians assessing their work for “excellent”, “good” and “satisfactory” were not detected (p>0.05). The most frequent problems complicating life of physicians and their families were “Fatigue, overwork” (69.06%), “lack of free time” (60.09%), “low income” (44.39%). The reliable relationship between these factors and professional self-assessment was not detected (p>0.05). The relationship between professional self-assessment and availability of qualification category, as well as stratum of society to which they relate themselves, was established.professional self-assessmentphysicianfactorsпрофессиональная самооценкаврачифакторы1.Abdel-Khalek A. M. Introduction to the Psychology of Self-esteem. In: F. Holloway (ed.). Self-Esteem: Perspectives, Influences and Improvement Strategies. N. Y.: Nova Science Publishers, Inc; 2016. P. 1-23.2.Brown J. D., Dutton K. A., Cook K. E. From the top down: Self-esteem and self-evaluation. Cognit. Emot. 2001;15(5):615-31. doi: 10.1080/026999301430000043.Branden N. The six pillars of self-esteem. N. Y.: Bantam Books; 1994.4.Молчанова О. Н. Самооценка: стабильность или изменчивость? Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2006;3(2):23-51.5.Субботина Л. Ю., Бондаренко М. Б. Взаимосвязь успешности и уровня самооценки в профессии военного. Ярославский педагогический вестник. 2016;(6):290-3.6.Баркалова Т. С. Влияние самооценки на уровень успешности профессиональной деятельности будущих менеджеров. Современная высшая школа: инновационный аспект. 2013;(4):20-2.7.Орлов Д. А., Эхте К. А., Дербенев Д. П. Самооценка врачами их квалификации и социального положения. Проблемы социальной гигиены, здравоохранения и истории медицины. 2015;23(6):35-7.8.Antonelli M. A. Accuracy of second-year medical students' self-assessment of clinical skills. Acad. Med. 1997;72(10, Suppl. 1):S63-5.9.Evans A. W., McKenna C., Oliver M. Self-assessment in medical practice. J. R. Soc. Med. 2002;95(10):511-3.10.Roland D., Matheson D., Coats T., Martin G. A qualitative study of self-evaluation of junior doctor performance: is perceived 'safeness' a more useful metric than confidence and competence? BMJ Open. 2015;5(11):e008521. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008521