<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1d1" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0869-866X</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2412-2106</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Joint-Stock Company Chicot</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2721</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32687/0869-866X-2026-34-3-765-770</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Научная статья</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF CLINICAL BIOETHICS: FROM PURE IDEA TO ORGANIZATION OF REGULAR CLINICAL CONSULTATIONS</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tarabrin</surname><given-names>R. E.</given-names></name><email></email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff-1">The Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “The I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University” of Minzdrav of Russia (Sechenov University), 119991, Moscow, Russia</aff><pub-date date-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2026-07-07" publication-format="electronic"><day>07</day><month>07</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>34</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>765</fpage><lpage>770</lpage><history><pub-date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2026-07-07"><day>07</day><month>07</month><year>2026</year></pub-date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright © 2026,</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year></permissions><abstract>The study considers historical development of clinical bioethics from formation of theoretical foundations of discipline in context of philosophy to institutionalization of practical forms of clinical consultations in medical institutions. The methodology of the study is based on interdisciplinary approach combining philosophical, historical, legal and sociocultural analysis of key factors of becoming of clinical bioethics in the USA. The study results demonstrate that despite initial concerns about excessive control over physician autonomy, ethical consultations improved quality of communication and decision-making, decreased conflictness and strengthened confidence between patients and medical personnel. The institutionalization of clinical bioethics became response to necessity of ethical maintenance of decisions occurring in clinical practice and proved its significance for modern medicine as tool of moral navigation, strengthening value of confidence and transparency in treatment process.</abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>clinical bioethics</kwd><kwd>history</kwd><kwd>health care organization</kwd><kwd>clinical bio-ethical consultations</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>клиническая биоэтика</kwd><kwd>история биомедицинской этики</kwd><kwd>организация здравоохранения</kwd><kwd>клинические консультации по биоэтике</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Шок Н. П., Щеглов А. П., Соложенкин Б. С. Философский дискурс биоэтики. Философия науки. 2018;(4):166—80.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Shok N., Beliakova N. Navigating Late USSR Family Planning: Scattered Narratives from Demography and Medicine. In: Challenging Norms Family Planning as a Reflection of Social Change in Twentieth-Century Eastern Europe. Berghahn; 2025. P. 334—63.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Reich W. T. The word &amp;quot;bioethics&amp;quot;: the struggle over its earliest meanings. Kennedy Institute of Ethics J. 1995;5(1):19—34.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Нежметдинова Ф. Т. , Гурылёва М.Э., Рибас С., Пелчич Г. Клиническая биоэтика на успешном пути. Казанский медицинский журнал. 2018;99(6):1028—31. doi: 10.17816/KMJ10524</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Баракова С. И., Доника А. Д. Роль этических комитетов в современной медицинской практике. Международный журнал экспериментального образования. 2017;4(1):51—2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Шок Н. От биоэтики светской к биоэтике христианской: о значении наследия Х. Тристрама Энгельгардта в России. Государство, религия, церковь в России и за рубежом. 2020;38(4):7—43.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Jonsen A. R. The birth of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Pellegrino E. D., Thomasma D. C. The virtues in medical practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Beauchamp T. L, Childress J. F. Principles of biomedical ethics. 8th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2019.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Тарабрин Р. Е. Исторический анализ становления и развития биоэтики в России: роль Х. Т. Энгельгардта. Бюллетень Национального научно-исследовательского института общественного здоровья имени Н. А. Семашко. 2025;(3):132—7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Jonsen A. R. Casuistry and clinical ethics. Theor Med. 1986;7(1):65—74.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Jonsen A. R., Siegler M., Winslade W. J. Clinical Ethics. 1st ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company; 1982.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Teel K. The physician&amp;apos;s dilemma, a doctor&amp;apos;s view: what the law should be. Baylor Law Review. 1975;(27):6—9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Siegler M. A legacy of Osler: teaching clinical ethics at the bedside. JAMA. 1978;239(10):951—6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Bouton K. Painful decisions: the role of the medical ethicist. New York Times. August 5, 1990, 65.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Macklin R. Mortal Choices: Ethical Dilemmas in Modern Medicine. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin; 1987.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Youngner S. J. A national survey of hospital ethics committees. In President&amp;apos;s Comission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Resarch. Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment. Washington (DC): 1983. P. 443—9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Lo B. Behind closed doors. New Engl. J. Med. 1987;317(1):46.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Fox E., Myers S., Pearlman R. A. Ethics consultation in United States hospitals: a national survey. Am. J. Bioethics. 2007;(7):13—25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Post L. F. Clinical Consulting: The Search for Resolution at the Intersection of Medicine, Law, and Ethics. HEC F. 2003;15:338.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Agich G. J. Clinical ethics: A role theoretic look. Soc. Sci. Med. 1990;30(4):389—99.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>McCarrick P. M. Bioethics consultation. Kennedy Institute of Ethics J. 1993;3(4):433—50.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Bliton M. J., Bartlett V. L. Exploring Clinical Ethics&amp;apos; Past to Imagine Its Possible Future (s). Am. J. Bioethics. 2018;18(6):55—7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Nelson J. L. Trusting Bioethicists. In: Eckenwiler L. A., Cohn F. G. (eds). The ethics of bioethics: Mapping the moral landscape. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2007. P. 47—58.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Engelhardt H. T. Bioethics as politics: a critical reassessment. In: Eckenwiler L. A., Cohn F. G. (eds). The ethics of bioethics: Mapping the moral landscape. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University; 2007. P. 118—33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Bell J. A. H. Clinical ethics consultations: a scoping review of reported outcomes. BMC Med. Ethics. 2022;23(1):99.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Friedrich A. B., Kohlberg E. M., R Malone J. Perceived Benefits of Ethics Consultation Differ by Profession: A Qualitative Survey Study. AJOB Empirical Bioethics. 2023;14(1):50—4. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2022.2093423</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Orr R. D. Evaluation of an ethics consultation service: patient and family perspective. Am. J. Med. 1996;101(2):135—41.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>McClung J. A. Evaluation of a medical ethics consultation service: opinions of patients and health care providers. Am. J. Med. 1996;100(4):456—60.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
