Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of MedicineProblems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine0869-866X2412-2106Joint-Stock Company Chicot270810.32687/0869-866X-2026-34-3-723-729Научная статьяTHE CENTERS OF FEMALE HEALTH: INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE AND THE MOSCOW INNOVATIVE MODELGadzhievaS. M.The Moscow Health Care Department, 127006, Moscow, Russia0707202634372372907072026Copyright © 2026,2026The global transformations in health care system, directed from reactive medicine to proactive and preventive model bring to the forefront issues of protection of female health. The health of woman is not only fundamental basis, but also key factor of social economic well-being of society, demographic stability and health of future generations. The traditional fragmented model of provision of obstetric gynecological care, focused mainly on treatment of already occurred pathologies and pregnancy management, demonstrates its inefficiency in the context of modern challenges: increase of chronic noncommunicable diseases, psycho-emotional loads and need of integration of reproductive health into general context of well-being of woman at all stages of her life. In the Russian Federation, the problem of modernization of obstetric gynecological service and, in particular, women consultations, is especially acute. Historically, The historically established system is often criticized for bureaucratization, insufficient focus on prevention and disparity between various levels of medical care. In this regard, emergence and implementation of new regional standards, in particular, metropolitan standard of obstetric gynecological care and Centers of Female Health is unique case requiring detailed scientific analysis and comparison with international advanced experience. The actuality of the study is conditioned by increasing need in developing new paradigm of medical care support of women, built on principles of complexity, continuity, personalization and orientation on prevention. The Centers of Female Health, integrating large spectrum of services, from screenings and diagnostics to psychological support and training programs, are considered by world community as gold standard of organization of such care.metropolitan standardobstetric gynecological careCenter of Female Healthclient routespatient orientationpreventive medicineмосковский стандарт акушерско-гинекологической помощиЦентры женского здоровьяклиентские путипациентоориентированностьпревентивная медицинаEssue B. M., Danforth K., Langer A. The economics of investing in women and health. Nat. Med. 2025;31:2532—45. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03864-8Lassi Z. S., Wade J. M., Ameyaw E. K. Stages and future of women's health: A call for a life-course approach. Womens Health (Lond.). 2025;21:17455057251331721. doi: 10.1177/17455057251331721Turner K., Brownstein N. C., Whiting J. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Women's Health Care Access: A Cross-Sectional Study. J. Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022;31(12):1690—702. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0128Kuhlmann E., Lotta G., Fernandez M., Herten-Crabb A., Mac Fehr L. SDG5 "Gender Equality" and the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid assessment of health system responses in selected upper-middle and high-income countries. Front. Public Health. 2023;11:1078008. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1078008Ahannach S., Van Hoyweghen I., Verhoeven V., Lebeer S. Citizen science as an instrument for women's health research. Nat. Med. 2024;30(12):3445—54. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03371-2Dixon S., McNiven A., Connolly A., Hinton L. Women's health and primary care: time to get it right for the life course. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2021;71(713):536—7. doi: 10.3399/bjgp21X717713Verbiest S., McClain E., Hernandez N. A Roadmap toward Equitable, Coordinated, Quality Reproductive Care for Women with Chronic Conditions. Health Serv. Res. 2022;57(6):1379—83. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14081Levorstad T., Saue M.-S., Nilsen A. B. V., Vik E. S. Midwives' experiences of an organizational change in early postpartum care services in Norway: A qualitative study. Eur. J. Midwifery. 2022;6:24. doi: 10.18332/ejm/147746Verbiest S. Continuing to Chart the Course Toward Improved Reproductive Care for Women with Chronic Conditions. Health Serv. Res. 2023;58(1):195—6. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14109Thakkar A. Cardio-Obstetrics: the Next Frontier in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2022;24(7):493—507. doi: 10.1007/s11883-022-01026-6Hammarberg K., Stocker R., Romero L., Fisher J. Pregnancy planning health information and service needs of women with chronic non-communicable conditions: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04498-1Erondu C., Dunlop A. L. Interpregnancy Care: An Opportunity to Improve Women's Health and Reduce the Risk of Maternal Morbidity and Mortality. Health Manag. Pract. 2021;27(Suppl 3):S155—8. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001319Jung J., Karwal E. K., McDonald S., Turner T., Chou D., Vogel J. P. Prevention and control of non-communicable diseases in antenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal care: a systematic scoping review of clinical practice guidelines since 2011. BMC Med. 2022;20(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02508-9Jasiura A., Dera I., Szlachcic K., Gorzel M., Zmonarska J. Breast cancer screening programmes in selected European countries and Poland. J. Educat. Health Sport. 2021;11(7):11—21. doi:10.12775/34598Topcu G., Savona-Ventura C., Ayres-de-Campos D. Provision of antenatal care in Europe-A scientific study commissioned by European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG). Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2022;272:30—6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.03.009Khattak H., Tsiapakidou S., Mukhopadhyay S., et al. Variations in sexual and reproductive health services for the provision of comprehensive contraceptive and abortion services across Europe: A questionnaire-based study commissioned by the European Board and College of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (EBCOG) and European Society of Contraception (ESC). Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2024;299:350—8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.05.026Womersley K., Hockham C., Mullins E. The Women's Health Strategy: ambitions need action and accountability. BMJ. 2022;378:o2059. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o2059Temkin S. M., Barr E., Moore H., Caviston J. P. Chronic conditions in women: the development of a National Institutes of health framework. BMC Women's Health. 2023;23(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02319-xМоисеева К. Е., Михайлова Ю. П., Алексеева А. В. Формирование, современное состояние и основные проблемы организации амбулаторной акушерско-гинекологической помощи в России. Медицина и организация здравоохранения. 2022;7(2):89—99. doi: 10.56871/1658.2022.95.20.011Шипова В. М., Щепин В. О., Миргородская О. В. Современные проблемы планирования акушерско-гинекологической помощи в Российской Федерации. Проблемы социальной гигиены, здравоохранения и истории медицины. 2021;29(4):877—84. doi: 10.32687/0869-866X-2021-29-4-877-884Коренная В. В. Развитие гинекологической помощи в Москве. Женские консультации как часть многопрофильных стационаров. Московская медицина. 2023;2(54):12—5.Оленев А. С. Центр женского здоровья: новая модель амбулаторной акушерско-гинекологической помощи. Московская медицина. 2024;2(60):80—5.Коренная В. В. Модернизация акушерско-гинекологической службы Москвы. Московская медицина. 2024;2(60):86—90.Коренная В. В. Забота о женском здоровье по новому стандарту. Московская медицина. 2025;2(66):4—11.