Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of MedicineProblems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine0869-866X2412-2106Joint-Stock Company Chicot233210.32687/0869-866X-2025-33-s2-1044-1050Научная статьяCRITERIAS FOR ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF MEDICAL SERVICES PROVIDED BY MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAMS IN THE COUNTRIES OF THE WORLD (LITERATURE REVIEW)TimofeevaA. S.KamyninaN. N.Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management, 115088, Moscow, Russia24102025331044105027102025Copyright © 1970,1970The article presents an analysis of international experience in assessing the quality of medical care provided to the population through multidisciplinary teams. The main tools for assessing the quality of medical care at the primary level of health care are considered. As tools were considered models of self-evaluation of professional activity of multidisciplinary teams, the level of satisfaction of patients with the medical services provided to them, criteria included in programs for monitoring the work of team specialists. The article reflects the results of the use of quality assessment tools in primary health care organizations in a number of countries: Great Britain, Spain, Canada, China, etc. The results of foreign studies underline the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in health care that affects various aspects of quality of medical care. Assessing criteria such as patient survival, access to care, safety of health services, compliance with recommendations and patient satisfaction allows key factors to be identified, improving the delivery of health care to the public through multidisciplinary teams.primary health careevaluation criteriaquality of carepatient satisfaction with health servicesreviewпервичная медико-санитарная помощькритерии оценкикачество медицинской помощиудовлетворённость пациентов медицинскими услугами, обзор[Siegel R. L., Miller K. D., Wagle N. S., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023 // CA Cancer J. Clin. 2023. Vol. 73, N 1. P. 17—48. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21763][Martin S. S., Aday A. W., Allen N. B. et al. 2025 heart disease and stroke statistics: a report of US and global data from the American Heart Association // Circulation. 2025. Vol. 151, N 8. P. e41—e660. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001303][Prince M., Guerchet M., Prina M. The epidemiology and impact of dementia: current state and future trends. WHO Thematic Briefing. Geneva; 2015.][Prince M., Comas-Herrera A., Knapp M. et al. World Alzheimer Report 2016. Improving healthcare for people living with dementia. Coverage, quality and costs now and in the future. London; 2016.][Berardi R., Morgese F., Rinaldi S. et al. Benefits and limitations of a multidisciplinary approach in cancer patient management // Cancer Manag. Res. 2020. Vol. 12. P. 9363—9374. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S220976][Cui P., Blanshard P., Campos-Partera M. T. et al. Enhancing multidisciplinary team processes in lung cancer care: a self-assessment toolkit and best practices // J. Clin. Pathways. 2024. Vol. 10, N 1. P. 19—25. DOI: 10.25270/jcp.2024.01.02][Rollet Q., Bouvier V., Moutel G. et al. Multidisciplinary team meetings: are all patients presented and does it impact quality of care and survival — a registry-based study // BMC Health Serv. Res. 2021. Vol. 21, N 1. P. 1032. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07022-x][Lucarini A., Garbarino G. M., Orlandi P. et al. From «cure» to «care»: the role of the multidisciplinary team on colorectal cancer patients' satisfaction and oncological outcomes // J. Multidiscip. Healthc. 2022. Vol. 15. P. 1415—1426. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S362550][Heinke M. Y., Vinod S. K. A review on the impact of lung cancer multidisciplinary care on patient outcomes // Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2020. Vol. 9, N 4. P. 1639—1653. DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.11.03][Guilabert M., Prades J., Borras J. M. et al. A web-based self-assessment model for evaluating multidisciplinary cancer teams in Spain: development and validation pilot study // J. Med. Internet Res. 2022. Vol. 24, N 3. P. e29063. DOI: 10.2196/29063][Taroeno-Hariadi K. W., Herdini C., Briliant A. S. et al. Multidisciplinary team meeting in the core of nasopharyngeal cancer management improved quality of care and survival of patients // Health Serv. Insights. 2023. Vol. 16. P. 11786329231204757. DOI: 10.1177/11786329231204757][Abdul Rehman M., Naeem U., Rani A. et al. How well does the virtual format of oncology multidisciplinary team meetings work? An assessment of participants' perspectives and limitations: a scoping review // PLoS One. 2023. Vol. 18, N 11. P. e0294635. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294635][Yu E. Y.T., Wan E. Y.F., Mak I. L. et al. Effectiveness of the Risk Assessment and Management Programme for hypertension (RAMP-HT) in reducing complications and service utilization after 5 years: a population-based matched cohort study // medRxiv preprint. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.12.22279844][Strumann C., Engler N. J., von Meissner W. C.G. et al. Quality of care in patients with hypertension: a retrospective cohort study of primary care routine data in Germany // BMC Prim. Care. 2024. Vol. 25, N 1. P. 54. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02285-9][Yu E. Y., Wan E. Y., Chan K. H. et al. Evaluation of the quality of care of a multi-disciplinary Risk Factor Assessment and Management Programme for Hypertension (RAMP-HT) // BMC Fam. Pract. 2015. Vol. 16. P. 71. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-015-0291-0][Babalola O., Goudge J., Levin J. et al. Assessing the utility of a quality-of-care assessment tool used in assessing comprehensive care services provided by community health workers in South Africa // Front. Public Health. 2022. Vol. 10. P. 868252. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.868252][Sourial N., Vedel I., Godard-Sebillotte C. et al. Sex differences in dementia primary care performance and health service use: a population-based study // J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2020. Vol. 68, N 5. P. 1056—1063. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16347][Slade S. C., Philip K., Morris M. E. Frameworks for embedding a research culture in allied health practice: a rapid review // Health Res. Policy Syst. 2018. Vol. 16, N 1. P. 29. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-018-0304-2][Ismail Z., Black S. E., Camicioli R. et al. Recommendations of the 5th Canadian Consensus Conference on the diagnosis and treatment of dementia // Alzheimers Dement. 2020. Vol. 16, N 8. P. 1182—1195. DOI: 10.1002/alz.12105][Sourial N., Godard-Sebillotte C., Bronskill S. E. et al. Quality indicator framework for primary care of patients with dementia // Can. Fam. Physician. 2022. Vol. 68, N 9. P. e270—e278. DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6809e270]