Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of MedicineProblems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine0869-866X2412-2106Joint-Stock Company Chicot178110.32687/0869-866X-2024-32-s2-1100-1105Научная статьяEFFECTIVENESS OF COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING STRATEGIES: A REVIEW OF CURRENT SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCEGrechushkinaN. A.renat2014@gmail.comStarshininA. V.renat2014@gmail.comTurzinP. S.renat2014@gmail.comDerbenevD. P.renat2014@gmail.comResearch Institute of Health Care Organization and Medical Management of the Moscow Health Care Department,Moscow Health Care Department,08112024321100110502072025Copyright © 1970,1970<p>Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies in the world. Its incidence and mortality could be reduce through primary prevention activities, which include healthy lifestyle behavior and avoidance of risk factors, and through screening (secondary prevention). Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of different colorectal cancer screening strategies is within the scope of interest of different health professionals. Therefore, the aim of this review is to synthesis the current scientific evidence that addresses the issues of effectiveness of population-based colorectal cancer screening programs and new methods for its early diagnosis.</p>colorectal cancerefficacycancer screeningsecondary preventioncolonoscopyfecal testsliterature reviewколоректальный ракэффективностьскрининг ракавторичная профилактикаколоноскопияфекальные тестыобзор литературы1.Waluga M., Zorniak M., Fichna J. et al. Pharmacological and dietary factors in prevention of colorectal cancer // J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2018. Vol. 69, N 3. DOI: 10.26402/jpp.2018.3.022.Song M. Global epidemiology and prevention of colorectal cancer // Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022. Vol. 7, N 7. P. 588—590.3.López P. J.T., Albero J. S., Rodríguez-Montes J. A. Primary and secondary prevention of colorectal cancer // Clin. Med. Insights: Gastroenterol. 2014. Vol. 7. Р. 33—46. DOI: 10.4137/CGast.S140394.Wang Z., Teng J., Wu W. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of risk assessment and fecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening: results from a population-based program and meta-analysis // Cancer Med. 2023. Vol. 12, N 17. P. 18189—18200.5.Yao M., Kaneko M., Watson J. et al. Gut feeling for the diagnosis of cancer in general practice: a diagnostic accuracy review // BMJ Open. 2023. Vol. 13, N 8. P. e068549.6.Nasir Kansestani A., Zare M. E., Tong Q. et al. Comparison of faecal protein biomarkers&apos; diagnostic accuracy for colorectal advanced neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Sci. Rep. 2022. Vol. 12, N 1. P. 2623.7.Yeh J. H., Tseng C. H., Wang W. L. et al. Performance of the fecal immunochemical test in detecting advanced colorectal neoplasms and colorectal cancers in people aged 40—49 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Cancers (Basel). 2023. Vol. 15, N 11. P. 3006.8.Belon A. P., McKenzie E., Teare G. et al. Effective strategies for fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) programs to improve colorectal cancer screening uptake among populations with limited access to the healthcare system: a rapid review // BMC Health Serv. Res. 2024. Vol. 24, N 1. P. 128.9.Richardson-Parry A., Silva M., Valderas J. M. et al. Interactive or tailored digital interventions to increase uptake in cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening to reduce health inequity: a systematic review // Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 2023. Vol. 32, N 4. P. 396—409.10.Mosquera I., Todd A., Balaj M. et al. Components and effectiveness of patient navigation programmes to increase participation to breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review // Cancer Med. 2023. Vol. 12, N 13. P. 14584—14611.11.Ahadinezhad B., Maleki A., Akhondi A. et al. Are behavioral economics interventions effective in increasing colorectal cancer screening uptake: a systematic review of evidence and meta-analysis? // PLoS One. 2024. Vol. 19, N 2. P. e0290424.12.Ding H., Lin J., Xu Z. et al. The association between organised colorectal cancer screening strategies and reduction of its related mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis // BMC Cancer. 2024. Vol. 24, N 1. P. 365.13.Han C., Wu F., Xu J. Effectiveness of sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial // Front. Oncol. 2024. Vol. 14. P. 1364923.14.Diedrich L., Brinkmann M., Dreier M. et al. Is there a place for sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening? A systematic review and critical appraisal of cost-effectiveness models // PLoS One. 2023. Vol. 18, N 8. P. e0290353.15.Pokharel R., Lin Y. S., McFerran E. et al. A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening in Europe: have studies included optimal screening intensities? // Appl. Health Econ. Health Policy. 2023. Vol. 21, N 5. P. 701—717.16.McFerran E., O&apos;Mahony J. F., Naber S. et al. Colorectal cancer screening within colonoscopy capacity constraints: can FIT-based programs save more lives by trading off more sensitive test cutoffs against longer screening intervals? // MDM Policy Pract. 2022. Vol. 7, N 1. P. 23814683221097064.17.Song D., Wang F., Ju Y. et al. Application and development of non-invasive biomarkers for colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review // Int. J. Surg. 2023. Vol. 109, N 4. P. 925—935.18.Stürzlinger H., Conrads-Frank A., Eisenmann A. et al. European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA). Stool DNA testing for early detection of colorectal cancer: systematic review using the HTA Core Model® for Rapid Relative Effectiveness Assessment // Ger. Med. Sci. 2023. Vol. 21. P. Doc06.19.Chan F. K.L., Wong M. C.S., Chan A. T. et al. Joint Asian Pacific Association of Gastroenterology (APAGE)-Asian Pacific Society of Digestive Endoscopy (APSDE) clinical practice guidelines on the use of non-invasive biomarkers for diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia // Gut. 2023. Vol. 72, N 7. P. 1240—1254.20.Mehta A., Kumar H., Yazji K. et al. Effectiveness of artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy in early diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a systematic review // Int. J. Surg. 2023. Vol. 109, N 4. P. 946—952.21.Thomas J., Ravichandran R., Nag A. et al. Advancing colorectal cancer screening: a comprehensive systematic review of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted versus routine colonoscopy // Cureus. 2023. Vol. 15, N 9. P. e45278.