Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of MedicineProblems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine0869-866X2412-2106Joint-Stock Company Chicot100010.32687/0869-866X-2022-30-5-727-733Научная статьяMETHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO THE FORMATION OF THE RATING OF THE CONSTITUENT ENTITIES OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, REFLECTING THE EFFICIENCY AND QUALITY OF MEDICAL CARE BY PROFILEMikhailovI. A.mikhailov@rosmedex.ruOmelyanovskyV. V.-SamsonovaE. S.-KusakinaV. O.-LebedenkoG. G.-Center of Expertise and Quality Control of Healthcare of Minzdrav of RussiaN. A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public HealthRussian Medical Academy for Continuous Professional Education, of Minzdrav of RussiaFinancial Research Institute of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation1512202230572773329102022Copyright © 2022,2022Aim of the study - determination of approaches to the formation of the rating of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, reflecting the state of medical care in various profiles (the effectiveness and quality of medical care in various profiles). The study included a comprehensive analysis of the structure and content of the reports based on the results of national medical research centers field events using classification and grouping methods. Assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of the used variants of the methodology for forming the subject rating of the Russian Federation used the method of selective SWOT analysis of methodologies published in the form of scientific articles. Further, based on the results obtained, the main requirements for building a rating system for subjects of the Russian Federation based on the indicators of efficiency (performance) and the quality of medical care were formulated. The possibility of applying international experience in building benchmarking systems in the Russian Federation is analyzed and requirements are formulated for building a subject rating system of the Russian Federation, taking into account the peculiarities of the domestic healthcare system. There are 3 main methodological approaches to the formation of the subject rating of the Russian Federation: a quantitative score rating assessment of quantitative indicators without weight coefficients, a qualitative rating assessment of the effectiveness of medical care in a profile without weight coefficients, and a mixed score-rating assessment of quantitative and qualitative indicators using weight coefficients determined only by an expert method. It has been established that many of the existing approaches to the formation of the subject rating of the Russian Federation are based on a combination of a point rating and weight coefficients established by an expert method. Since different indicators have different contributions to the final integral value of the subject rating of the Russian Federation, it is advisable to conduct another study to establish weight coefficients for indicators.rating of constituent entities of the Russian Federationeffectiveness of providing medical careprofile of medical carenational medical research centersclinical guidelinesprocedures for providing of medical careрейтинг субъектов РФэффективность оказания медицинской помощипрофиль медицинской помощинациональные медицинские исследовательские центрыклинические рекомендациипорядки оказания медицинской помощи1.Camp R. C., Tweet A. G. Benchmarking Applied to Health Care. J. Qual. Improv. 1994;20(5):229-38.2.Donabedian A. Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care. Milbank Mem. Fund. Q. 1966;44(3):691-729.3.The Quality Indicator Study Group. An approach to the evaluation of quality indicators of the outcome of care in hospitalized patients, with a focus on nosocomial infection indicators. Am. J. Infect. Control. 1995;23(3):215-22. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(95)90045-44.Haustein T., Gastmeier P., Holmes A., Lucet J. C., Shannon R. P., Pittet D., Harbarth S. Use of benchmarking and public reporting for infection control in four high-income countries. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2011;11(6):471-81. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70315-75.Hibbard J. H., Stockard J., Tusler M. Hospital performance reports: Impact on quality, market share, and reputation. Health Aff. 2005;24(4):1150-60.6.Hibbard J. H., Stockard J., Tusler M. Does publicizing hospital performance stimulate quality improvement efforts? Health Aff. 2003;22(2):84-94.7.Giovanelli L., Marinò L., Rotondo F., Fadda N., Ezza A., Amadori M. Developing a performance evaluation system for the Italian public healthcare sector. Pub. Money Manag. 2015;35(4):297-302. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2015.10472748.Nuti S. Performance Evaluation System. 2020. Режим доступа: https://www.santannapisa.it/en/institute/management/performance-evaluation-system (дата обращения 13.05.2022).9.Roberts D. A., Ng M., Ikilezi G., Gasasira A., Dwyer-Lindgren L., Fullman N., Nalugwa T., Kamya M., Gakidou E. Benchmarking health system performance across regions in Uganda: A systematic analysis of levels and trends in key maternal and child health interventions, 1990-2011. BMC Med. 2015;13(1):1-16. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0518-x10.Егоров В. А., Дроздова Л. Ю., Лищенко О. В., Драпкина О. М. Комплексные подходы к оценке качества оказания медицинской помощи и укрепления здоровья населения. Профилактическая медицина. 2020;23(6):14-20. doi: 10.17116/profmed2020230621411.Готье С. В., Хомяков С. М. Донорство и трансплантация органов в Российской Федерации в 2019 году. XII сообщение регистра Российского трансплантологического общества. Вестник трансплантологии и искусственных органов. 2020;22(2):8-34. doi: 10.15825/1995-1191-2020-2-8-3412.Tandon A., Murray C. J., Lauer J. А., Evans D. B. Measuring health system performance for 191 countries. Eur. J. Health Econ. 2002;3(3):145-8.